30.04.2015 Views

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

surviving spouses from serially marrying poor people not long for this world and racking up<br />

their DSUE Amounts. While the language is effective in precluding this practice, it has another<br />

interesting ramification. For one who is the surviving spouse of multiple predeceased spouses,<br />

the order of death matters. Another example from the Joint Committee on Taxation illustrates:<br />

Example 2.−Assume the same facts as in Example 1, except that Wife<br />

subsequently marries Husband 2. Husband 2 also predeceases Wife, having<br />

made $4 million in taxable transfers and having no taxable estate. An election is<br />

made on Husband 2's estate tax return to permit Wife to use Husband 2's<br />

deceased spousal unused exclusion amount. Although the combined amount of<br />

unused exclusion of Husband 1 and Husband 2 is $3 million ($2 million for<br />

Husband 1 and $1 million for Husband 2), only Husband 2’s $1 million unused<br />

exclusion is available for use by Wife, because the deceased spousal unused<br />

exclusion amount is limited to the lesser of the basic exclusion amount ($5<br />

million) or the unused exclusion of the last deceased spouse of the surviving<br />

spouse (here, Husband 2’s $1 million unused exclusion). Thereafter, Wife's<br />

applicable exclusion amount is $6 million (her $5 million basic exclusion amount<br />

plus $1 million deceased spousal unused exclusion amount from Husband 2),<br />

which she may use for lifetime gifts or for transfers at death. 23<br />

In this example, had Husband 2 predeceased Husband 1, Wife’s applicable exclusion amount<br />

would have been the same $7 million as in the Technical Explanation’s Example 1.<br />

Some planners might think an easy way to solve the problem of the surviving spouse<br />

who remarries a wealthier spouse who also predeceases is simply to avoid making a DSUE<br />

Amount election on the wealthier deceased spouse’s estate tax return. But the statute refers<br />

to the “last deceased spouse” and not the “last deceased spouse that made a DSUE Amount<br />

election.” So if the executor of the last deceased spouse makes no election at all, the surviving<br />

spouse’s DSUE Amount is zero, even if the intent in not making the election was to preserve the<br />

DSUE Amount from an earlier predeceased spouse of the surviving spouse. 24<br />

4. Making the Election.<br />

The DSUE Amount is not available automatically; the statute requires an election from<br />

the first deceased spouse’s executor. The 2010 Act explains in this addition to § 2010(c):<br />

23 Joint Committee Report,supra note 5, at 52.<br />

24 As the Joint Committee puts it, “The last deceased spouse limitation applies whether or not the last deceased<br />

spouse has any unused exclusion or the last deceased spouse’s estate makes a timely election.” Id. at n. 57.<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!