30.04.2015 Views

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. Isle v. Brady, 288 P.3d 259 (Okla. Civ. App. 2012). <strong>Trust</strong>ee’s fees to<br />

prepare accounting and repair property were proper. One of four trust<br />

beneficiaries was also a trustee, who failed to provide an accounting after<br />

the deaths of the settlors and also permitted rental property to fall into a<br />

state of disrepair. Other three beneficiaries filed a petition to have trustee<br />

removed, at which point an independent successor trustee was appointed.<br />

Successor trustee charged an hourly rate and also incurred other expenses.<br />

Initial trustee objected to fees charged to the trust. The Court considered<br />

the following factors for determining the propriety of the trustee’s fees:<br />

trustee’s skill and expertise, amount and character of trust property, degree<br />

of difficulty, nature and costs of services, and quality of trustee’s<br />

performance. The Court determined that given the time required by the<br />

rental properties and other actions required to prepare the accounting<br />

justified the fees charged.<br />

4. In the Matter of <strong>Trust</strong> of Trimble, 826 N.W.2d 474 (Iowa 2013).<br />

<strong>Trust</strong>ee was not obligated to account to remainder beneficiaries for<br />

the period in which the trust was revocable and the settlor was<br />

competent. Eight months prior to the death of the settlor, settlor amended<br />

her revocable trust to name trustee as sole trustee. <strong>Trust</strong>ee made verbal<br />

reports to the settlor on the status of the trust and regularly consulted with<br />

her. After settlor’s death, two of eighteen beneficiaries petitioned the<br />

court to require the trustee to account for the period of administration prior<br />

to the settlor’s death. <strong>Trust</strong>ee eventually provided an account, but the<br />

probate court held the trustee personally liable for her attorneys’ fees. The<br />

Court held that while the trust is revocable and the settlor is alive and<br />

competent, the trustee only owes a duty to account to the settlor and that<br />

due to privacy concerns, beneficiaries are not entitled to an accounting<br />

while the trust was revocable. The probate court’s ruling that the trustee<br />

was required to pay her own attorneys’ fees was an abuse of discretion.<br />

I. Procedural Issues in <strong>Trust</strong> Dispute<br />

1. Estate of Giraldin, 290 P.3d 199 (Cal. 2012). The beneficiaries of a<br />

revocable trust have standing to sue a third party trustee for breaches<br />

of fiduciary duties that occurred during the settlor’s lifetime. In 2002,<br />

a settlor established a revocable family trust naming his son as trustee.<br />

The trust provided for the distribution of net income and discretionary<br />

principal to the settlor during his lifetime, and thereafter for the creation of<br />

a trust for the benefit of the settlor’s wife, with the remainder passing at<br />

her death equally to their nine children (some from previous marriages).<br />

The settlor reserved the right to revoke or amend the trust in writing. The<br />

settlor also executed a will leaving his separate property and his share of<br />

all community property to his trust, with son named as the executor.<br />

Thereafter, the settlor invested $4 million in son’s company through<br />

payments to the company. After the final payment, the company issued<br />

stock to the settlor that he then transferred to his trust. At the time of the<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!