30.04.2015 Views

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Through good planning and good practices, in addition to upfront communication which<br />

sets forth expectations, the chances for misunderstandings and disputes with<br />

beneficiaries can hopefully be avoided, or in the very least, minimized.<br />

In addition to educating the parties to the trust and establishing good ground rules and<br />

practices for communications among the parties, several planning strategies may be<br />

available to provide flexibility and address potential issues which may arise, particularly<br />

with the use of irrevocable dynasty trusts designed with a long “shelf life.” Among those<br />

available are the following:<br />

Delegation and Divided Duties:<br />

Can dividing traditional trust duties among different individuals protect trustees and<br />

minimize disputes among beneficiaries? The most obvious division of duties is<br />

separating trust administration from investment management. Historically, a trustee<br />

could not delegate the duties assumed under the trust without explicit authorization in<br />

the trust document. Modern trust law, however, now allows for broad delegation of a<br />

trustee’s duties. Most jurisdictions now permit trustees to delegate certain<br />

responsibilities to third parties, and trust documents often include such delegation<br />

provisions. For example, the trust document may allow for the appointment of specific<br />

individuals or committees to address investments and discretionary distributions.<br />

Drafting considerations must take into account the appropriate parties who can serve on<br />

such committees, and even when exercising delegation powers, a trustee still has<br />

responsibility to find the appropriate person to whom the delegation is made, in addition<br />

to consistently monitoring the agent to avoid liability. (See Minn. Stat. 501B.152 Agents<br />

of <strong>Trust</strong>ee). Therefore, the trustee must (1) ensure that the agent is fully capable of<br />

performing the delegated duties, (2) provide sufficient information to him or her to carry<br />

out these duties on a continuing basis, and (3) clearly define the terms and scope of the<br />

delegation.<br />

Some other issues to consider in situations where delegation is being considered or<br />

utilized:<br />

--the trustee may want to memorialize the reasons for delegating certain duties,<br />

including the trustee’s own abilities and limitations to perform certain functions;<br />

--the scope and terms of the agent’s duties should be set forth and understood by all<br />

parties;<br />

--the agent’s compensation and how that might affect the compensation of the trustee;<br />

--the trustee’s expectations for the agent’s performance, and the respective rights and<br />

responsibilities of both parties; and<br />

--the agent’s accounting and reporting responsibilities.<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!