30.04.2015 Views

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Minnesota</strong> courts, at least at an appellate level, have not directly addressed the effect of non‐resident<br />

status on a guardianship determination. To see what they may likely do, let’s go back to the<br />

guardianship statute.<br />

524.5‐204 JUDICIAL APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN: CONDITIONS FOR APPOINTMENT.<br />

(a) The court may appoint a guardian for a minor if the court finds the appointment is in the minor's best<br />

interest, and:<br />

(i) both parents are deceased; or<br />

(ii) all parental rights have been terminated by court order.<br />

If a guardian is appointed by a parent pursuant to section 524.5‐202 and the appointment has not been<br />

prevented or terminated under section 524.5‐203, that appointee has priority for appointment.<br />

The statute gives priority to one appointed by the parent and applies a standard well known to family law<br />

attorneys, the best interest standard. In determining best interest, the court would likely look to the factors laid<br />

out in Statute 518.17. Two factors in particular may disfavor guardianship by a non‐resident; factor (6), the<br />

child's adjustment to home, school, and community and factor (7) the length of time the child has lived in a<br />

stable, satisfactory environment and the desirability of maintaining continuity.<br />

Practical issues may also interfere with the child moving out of country, the most obvious of which is<br />

transferring a guardianship order made in <strong>Minnesota</strong> to the new home country and ensuring the child can<br />

obtain legal status to reside in that country. The parents, in naming a non‐resident guardian, should also be<br />

aware that in that choice, they are likely choosing a move to a foreign country for their child.<br />

The decision to name a foreign guardian takes an evaluation of the particular situation of the family and<br />

discussion of how to address practical issues. Generally, if the parents feel that the best choice to care for the<br />

child is a non‐resident, even knowing the child will likely move to a foreign country, they should make that<br />

desire known. There may be little chance that a court would name a non‐resident as guardian, unless they<br />

acquire priority through appointment in the will.<br />

Like many issues, there is an international treaty covering guardianship issues. The Convention of 1961<br />

Concerning the Powers of Authorities and the <strong>Law</strong> Applicable in Respect of the Protection of Minors,<br />

also known as the Hague Protection of Minors Convention also considers the interests of the child.<br />

However, the United States is not a signatory.<br />

10. Appointing a foreigner as trustee of a minor’s trust will not have tax consequences.<br />

So wrong.<br />

The IRS has very strict rules regarding foreign trusts. It is quite possibly the most significant trap for the<br />

unwary.<br />

From the IRS website, a foreign trust is any trust other than a domestic trust.<br />

A domestic trust is any trust if: A court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over<br />

the administration of the trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial<br />

decisions of the trust.<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!