30.04.2015 Views

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This was commonly known as the "transfer/apply/deny" strategy by which all<br />

excess assets were transferred to another family member in one lump sum, the<br />

individual then applied for medical assistance benefits, and the penalty period<br />

would then start to run. Once the penalty period started to run, the penalty period<br />

was shortened by one month for each month after the start of the penalty period,<br />

and the penalty period was further reduced by returning part of the transferred<br />

assets each month as the original transferor needed funds to pay medical expenses<br />

not covered by medical assistance. This strategy allowed the family members to<br />

keep substantial portions of transferred assets.<br />

To stop this practice, or at least hinder it, the 2009 amendment proposed to allow a<br />

penalty period to be reduced or eliminated only if all transferred assets are<br />

returned within 12 months of the start date of the penalty period. The amendment<br />

prohibited adjustment of a penalty period unless the full value of the transferred<br />

assets was returned.<br />

This change was supposed to be effective for periods of ineligibility established on<br />

or after January 1, 2011, but was blocked until implementation of the State Plan<br />

Amendment discussed below.<br />

Previous policy remains in effect, allowing the transfer/apply/deny strategy,<br />

for penalty periods imposed prior to December 1, 2011. Previous policy can<br />

be found by following the “Archive” link in HCPM § 19.40.35.<br />

B. THE STATE PLAN AMENDMENT<br />

Here, in pertinent part, is the State Plan Amendment approved by the Chicago<br />

Regional Office of CMS in September of 2011. The new language is shown by<br />

underlining:<br />

State: <strong>Minnesota</strong><br />

Supplement 9 to Attachment 2.6-A<br />

TN-11-03 Page 3<br />

Effective: 01/01/11<br />

Approved: SEP 23 2011<br />

Supersedes: 06-11, 03-22 and 96-17<br />

10. Eliminating a Penalty Period Established on or after January 1,<br />

2011: A penalty period cannot be shortened by a partial return of assets<br />

used in the calculation of the penalty period. A penalty period can be<br />

eliminated only if the transferors have all assets that were included in the<br />

calculation of the penalty period returned to them. An asset will not be<br />

considered returned unless the value of the asset at the time of return is not<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!