30.04.2015 Views

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

VII. DOMESTIC ASSET PROTECTION AND SELF-SETTLED TRUSTS<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>Trust</strong>s generally provide excellent asset protection. A self-settled trust is one of the more<br />

frequently used types of domestic asset protection trusts (DAPT). It is generally a discretionary<br />

irrevocable trust where the grantor or settlor is a permissible beneficiary. If properly structured,<br />

creditors cannot reach the assets in a self-settled trust to satisfy certain creditor claims against the<br />

settlor. A self-settled trust can be drafted to either keep trust assets within the settlor’s estate or<br />

remove them, which allows a wealthy individual to establish a self-settled trust even though that<br />

individual’s gift tax exemption has been fully utilized. However, advisors generally suggest<br />

structuring the DAPT as a self-settled trust included in the grantor’s gross estate.<br />

Generally, the settlor would place 10% to 40% of their financial assets into a DAPT to protect<br />

those assets from possible future creditors. The settlor is a permissible discretionary beneficiary<br />

of the DAPT, but does not generally use the trust for everyday living expenses, as this could<br />

weaken the asset protection.<br />

a. Offshore Scrutiny<br />

Offshore asset protection has lost momentum as a result of increased scrutiny and<br />

reporting requirements by the United States government. Consequently, DAPTs are quite<br />

popular, and can provide significant advantages for clients.<br />

2. STATES WITH DAPT STATUTES<br />

Alaska, ALASKA STAT. § 34.40.110.<br />

Delaware, DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 12, §§ 3570 to 3576.<br />

Hawaii, HAW. REV. STAT. §§ 554G-1 to -11.<br />

Missouri, MO. REV. STAT. § 456.5-505.<br />

Nevada, NEV. REV. STAT. ANN. §§ 166.010 to 166.180.<br />

New Hampshire, N.H. REV. STAT. ANN. §§ 564-D:1 to 564-D:18.<br />

Ohio, OHIO REV. CODE ANN. §§ 5816.01 to .14.<br />

Oklahoma, OKLA. STAT. tit. 31, §§ 10 to 18.<br />

Rhode Island, R.I. GEN. LAWS §§ 18-9.2-1 to -7.<br />

South Dakota, SOUTH DAKOTA CODIFIED LAWS §§ 55-16-1 to -16.<br />

Tennessee, TENN. CODE ANN. §§ 35-16-101 to -112.<br />

Utah, UTAH CODE ANN. § 25-6-14.<br />

Virginia, VA. CODE ANN. § 64.2-745.1.<br />

Wyoming, WYO. STAT. ANN. §§ 4-10-501 to -523.<br />

3. KEY FACTORS TO ASSET PROTECTION/SELF-SETTLED TRUST SITUS<br />

An important consideration in regard to setting up DAPTs is the application of the DAPT state’s<br />

laws. Generally, a court in a non-DAPT state may be more likely to apply the laws of the DAPT<br />

state if most of the trust contacts are with the DAPT state. Some key factors that a non-DAPT<br />

court may consider are:<br />

a. Governing law in the trust instrument;<br />

i. Governing law of a DAPT state;<br />

b. Location of trustee/where the trust is administered;<br />

i. Same as governing law of trust (DAPT state);<br />

© South Dakota <strong>Trust</strong> Company LLC – All Rights Reserved<br />

Page | 34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!