30.04.2015 Views

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

iii.<br />

Discretionary <strong>Trust</strong><br />

<strong>Trust</strong>s created with assets of someone other than the recipient or someone with a financial<br />

obligation to that person, are not considered available if the recipient as “restricted access” to<br />

the <strong>Trust</strong> funds. Restricted access means that only a <strong>Trust</strong>ee can withdraw funds, or in other<br />

words, the <strong>Trust</strong>ee has broad and absolute discretion to make distributions or not. Health Care<br />

Programs Manuel (HCPM) §19.25.35.30, see also, In re Horton, 668 N.W.2d 208 (Minn.App.<br />

2003); In re Flygare, 725 N.W. 2d 114 (Minn.App. 2007); and Irrevocable <strong>Trust</strong> Agreement of<br />

Craig C. Wilcox, (Minn.App 2009 – UNPUBLISHED OPINION)(This is a line of cases that stands for the<br />

proposition that any standards for distribution beyond a pure statement of <strong>Trust</strong>ee discretion<br />

will render the <strong>Trust</strong> corpus available to the beneficiary for purposes of Medical Assistance<br />

eligibility). The applicant for or recipient of Medical Assistance may be required to ask the<br />

<strong>Trust</strong>ee for distributions, but the <strong>Trust</strong>ee’s refusal to make distributions will not disqualify the<br />

beneficiary from receiving Medical Assistance. A third party can, as a result, establish a<br />

“restricted access <strong>Trust</strong>” for the benefit of a disabled individual without jeopardizing that<br />

person’s eligibility for Medical Assistance with language that provides the <strong>Trust</strong>ee with the<br />

“sole and absolute discretion to distribute some, none or all of the trust income and principal<br />

for the benefit of the beneficiary” and notes that “the beneficiary shall have no recourse to<br />

force the trustee to make distributions for his or her benefit.” The advantages of this type of<br />

<strong>Trust</strong> over a SupplementalNeeds<strong>Trust</strong> include:<br />

• Certification of disability is not required at the time the <strong>Trust</strong> is established.<br />

• Avoid the loss of enforceability if the beneficiary is 65 or older and a permanent resident<br />

of a nursing home or state facility.<br />

• Reduce the need for required vendor payments.<br />

• Less frustrating management for a beneficiary who overcomes the disability, no longer<br />

needs public assistance and would prefer to manage financial affairs on his or her own.<br />

A purely discretionary trust is less attractive because:<br />

<br />

<br />

The trustee has absolute discretion leaving the beneficiary without recourse if the<br />

trustee is lazy or vindictive.<br />

The availability of trust resources is based only the statutory interpretation of the<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong> Court of Appeals in decisions where it found trusts to be available because<br />

the trust language included distribution standards. No appellate court has held that<br />

purely discretionary trusts are unavailable so the concept could be undone with one bad<br />

case.<br />

iv.<br />

Pooled SupplementalNeeds<strong>Trust</strong><br />

Lutheran Social Service of <strong>Minnesota</strong> administers a Pooled SupplementalNeeds<strong>Trust</strong> along with<br />

its Pooled SpecialNeeds<strong>Trust</strong>s. This can be a convenient, lower cost alternative to the<br />

4 Supplemental & Special Needs <strong>Trust</strong> Basics | Jeffrey W. Schmidt

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!