30.04.2015 Views

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

promissory notes and/or mortgages, be treated as advancements, and deducted<br />

from his share of her estate.<br />

Bank of America, N.A. (“<strong>Trust</strong>ee”) as <strong>Trust</strong>ee for the <strong>Trust</strong> petitioned the court<br />

for guidance on the terms of the <strong>Trust</strong> pertaining to loans and advancements.<br />

They also sought guidance in calculating the two sons’ interest in the trust<br />

income and principle. The provision as to which interpretation was sought by<br />

the <strong>Trust</strong>ee was as follows:<br />

“7. Allocation of remaining trust assets.<br />

…I intend my children to be treated essentially equally as to<br />

advancements and loans received during my lifetime or assets of my<br />

estate received at my death. If, at my death, either child of mine is<br />

indebted to me on a Promissory Note or mortgage, I direct that the<br />

outstanding principal balance and accrued interest of the indebtedness<br />

be considered an advancement to such child from my estate and be<br />

deducted from the share of the residue due my child…thus reducing his<br />

share of other assets of my estate accordingly. The amount of said<br />

outstanding principal balance and accrued interest shall be determined<br />

by my trustees based upon my records or the trustees’ records. Such<br />

indebtedness shall be considered an asset of my estate for purposes of<br />

computing the value of said estate.”<br />

<strong>Law</strong>rence moved for summary judgement arguing that the <strong>Trust</strong> provisions on<br />

loans and advancements were clear and unambiguous and only pertained to<br />

indebtedness evidenced by promissory notes or mortgages. The district court<br />

referee did not find the <strong>Trust</strong> language to be ambiguous and therefore granted<br />

summary judgment. The district court confirmed the referee’s findings and<br />

upheld summary judgment in favor of <strong>Law</strong>rence.<br />

Mary Frances M. Price, J.D.<br />

EDINA ESTATE AND ELDER LAW P.A.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!