30.04.2015 Views

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

outright and free of trust. If either son does not<br />

survive me, his share shall be held in trust and<br />

administered in accordance with the provisions of<br />

<strong>Section</strong> 9 and subsequent sections. Notwithstanding<br />

the forgoing, I intend my children to be treated<br />

essentially equally as to advancements and loans<br />

received during my lifetime or assets of my estate<br />

received at my death. If, at my death, either child of<br />

mine is indebted to me on a Promissory Note or<br />

Mortgage, I direct that the outstanding principal<br />

balance and accrued interest of the indebtedness be<br />

considered an advancement to such child from my<br />

estate and be deducted from the share of the residue<br />

due my child (or any share for the then living<br />

descendant or descendants, collectively, by right of<br />

representation, of my child if he is then dead<br />

leaving a descendant or descendants then living),<br />

thus reducing his share of other assets of my estate<br />

accordingly. The amount of said outstanding<br />

principal balance and accrued interest shall be<br />

determined by my trustees based upon my records<br />

or the trustees’ records. Such indebtedness is to be<br />

considered an asset of my estate for the purposes of<br />

computing the value of said estate.” (Emphasis<br />

added.)<br />

The court determined that while promissory notes and mortgages were<br />

expressly to be treated as advancements under the terms of this provision,<br />

it was not certain from this language that the grantor intended that only<br />

promissory note and mortgages were to be considered advancements.<br />

d. Determining exactly what a loan is can also be the cause of significant<br />

disagreement. Intra family “loans” are frequently not documented with<br />

formal promissory notes. In a case not involving an equalization clause but<br />

rather simply whether sums shown in a notebook as loans as well as noted<br />

as loans on the checks given to a child, the Nebraska Supreme Court found<br />

this to be sufficient to hold that sums so advanced to the child were loans<br />

for trust administration purposes. In re Margaret Mastny Revocable <strong>Trust</strong>,<br />

744 N.W. 2d 700 (Neb. 2011). Here the fact that the amounts in issue were<br />

not reported as gifts on tax returns was also considered by the court.<br />

Here is an example of a definition of “Loans” that was used in a document which<br />

provided that all “Loans” included among the assets of a trust would be allocated to the<br />

obligor:<br />

“It is hereby provided that the value of the Loans, for purposes of division of the residue of the<br />

trust estate, shall be the outstanding principal and interest with respect to the Loans, up to and<br />

- 18 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!