30.04.2015 Views

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Well-Prepared Executive: Personal Wealth Preservation Strategies<br />

value, the Board must ignore any restrictions (e.g.,<br />

securities law restrictions) other than those which,<br />

by their terms, will never lapse. IRC § 422(c)(7).<br />

This is the same rule under IRC § 83 discussed<br />

above.<br />

(4) Grant Date.<br />

Because the exercise price must equal fair<br />

market value on the grant date, it is important to<br />

determine the grant date. In general, the grant date is<br />

the date when the corporation completes all<br />

corporate action constituting an offer to sell stock<br />

under the ISO. Treas. Reg. § 1.421-7(c)(1).<br />

(5) Conditional Grants.<br />

A conditional grant is not a grant for ISO<br />

purposes. For example, if an individual is granted<br />

an ISO on the condition that he become an<br />

employee, the grant date will not be until the first<br />

date of employment. Treas. Reg. § 1.421-7(c)(2). It<br />

is crucial to distinguish between conditions to the<br />

grant (i.e., conditions precedent) and conditions to<br />

the exercise of the option. For example, the grant<br />

date for an executive who is hired and granted ISOs<br />

conditioned on continued employment for 6 months<br />

would likely be treated as the six-month anniversary<br />

date. If the value of the stock increased during this<br />

6-month period and the executive was given an<br />

exercise price based on the value as of the hire date,<br />

then the option would fail to qualify as an ISO<br />

because the exercise price would not equal the stock<br />

value on the grant date six months later. To avoid<br />

this issue, employers should make clear that the<br />

grant of the ISO is unconditional but that the<br />

employee has to remain employed for six months to<br />

exercise the ISO subject to any other vesting<br />

provisions. One exception is that the grant of an<br />

ISO conditioned on subsequent shareholder<br />

approval will not be viewed as a conditional grant<br />

for ISO purposes so that the grant date is when the<br />

ISO is granted. Treas. Reg. § 1.421-7(c)(2).<br />

c. 10-Year Grant Period.<br />

ISOs must be granted within 10 years from<br />

the date that the plan is adopted by the Board or<br />

approved by the shareholders (whichever is later).<br />

IRC § 422(b)(3).<br />

d. 10-Year Exercise Period.<br />

ISO agreement must state that the ISO may<br />

not be exercised more than 10 years from date of<br />

grant, but if the employee owns more than 10% of<br />

the voting stock of the employer, the ISO by its<br />

terms must not be exercisable more than 5 years<br />

from the grant date. IRC § 422(b)(3).<br />

7<br />

e. Non-transferable.<br />

ISO agreement must state that the ISO may<br />

not be transferred except by will or by laws of<br />

descent. IRC § 422(b)(5). The ISO agreement may<br />

permit the employee to designate a beneficiary. The<br />

employer can amend the ISO plan to provide ISO<br />

holders with this alternative without the amendment<br />

resulting in a modification of the ISO for tax<br />

purposes. Rev. Rul. 69-648, 1969-2 C.B. 103.<br />

f. $100,000 Per Year Limitation.<br />

Aggregate fair market value (determined as of the<br />

grant date) of stock that can be purchased by the<br />

executive pursuant to ISOs exercisable for the first<br />

time during any one calendar year (under all plans<br />

of the employer corporation and its parent and<br />

subsidiary corporations) may not exceed $100,000.<br />

IRC § 422(d). In applying the $100,000 limitations,<br />

multiple grants of ISOs are taken into account in the<br />

order granted. IRC § 422(d)(2).<br />

(1) For example, assume an executive is<br />

granted 60,000 shares with a fair market value<br />

executive price of $10 with the ISOs vesting 1/6 per<br />

year over 6 years. In any given year, the maximum<br />

that the employee could exercise, based on the grant<br />

date value, is $100,000, thereby satisfying the<br />

$100,000 per year limitation. By contrast, if the<br />

executive vested over 3 years, the employee could<br />

exercise, based on the grant date value, $200,000<br />

per year, thereby failing the $100,000 per year<br />

limitation.<br />

(2) The ISO plan may permit more than<br />

$100,000 per year so long as it specifies that the<br />

excess over $100,000 will be treated as NQOs.<br />

Notice 87-49, 1987-2 C.B. 355. The company can<br />

designate which options are ISOs and which are<br />

NQOs and when an ISO is exercised it can<br />

designate the stock as ISO stock. If this is not done,<br />

then a pro rata share of each option will be an ISO<br />

and a pro rata share of each stock will be ISO stock.<br />

(3) Oftentimes, the vesting and exercisability of<br />

an ISO will accelerate upon a change in control.<br />

The acceleration of unvested ISOs may result in<br />

some of the ISOs being recharacterized as NQOs<br />

under the $100,000 test. Assume in the example<br />

above where the executive receives 60,000 ISOs at<br />

$10 per share vesting over 6 years that the employer<br />

is acquired at the beginning of year 3. If the<br />

unvested 40,000 ISOs became vested on the change<br />

of control, the employee would now have the right<br />

to exercise $400,000 of ISOs in year 3, resulting in<br />

$300,000 (or 30,000 ISOs) failing to qualify under<br />

the $100,000 rule.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!