30.04.2015 Views

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong>, as in many other states, has adopted various versions of a law designed<br />

primarily to protect surviving spouses from being disinherited by the deceased spouse. In<br />

<strong>Minnesota</strong>, these protective statutes have evolved over the years starting with provisions in<br />

place prior to 1985 to provisions enacted after 1985. The common thread in all the iterations of<br />

the spousal protective statutes is the protection of the surviving spouse by guaranteeing that the<br />

surviving spouse inherits some portion of the deceased spouse’s assets. <strong>Minnesota</strong>’s various<br />

versions of these statutes either expand the classes of assets that the surviving spouse can<br />

have access to or prevents the overreaching of the surviving spouse vis-à-vis other<br />

beneficiaries of the deceased spouse.<br />

Historically, surviving spouses’ interests in each other’s property rested largely in real<br />

property rights protected under the common law concepts of dower and curtsey which<br />

preserved for widows an interest in any realty seized or possessed by their husbands during<br />

their marriage. 1<br />

This preservation of rights in realty however provided no comfort for surviving<br />

spouses whose deceased spouses elected to hold or convert real property interests to personal<br />

property interests during their lifetime. 2<br />

Statutory schemes designed to further protect the surviving spouse from complete<br />

disinheritance grew out of the recognition that the primary source of wealth in society had<br />

shifted from real property to personal property. These new schemes or forced shares included<br />

both real and personal property.<br />

1 Andrew E. Tanick and Pamela L. Johnson; The <strong>Probate</strong> Reform: The New <strong>Minnesota</strong> Elective Share<br />

Statutes, 70 Minn. <strong>Law</strong> Review, 241, 247 (1985)<br />

2 See Peterson and Wolfson, Election Against the Wills; The Elective Share of Surviving Spouse, The<br />

Bench & Bar of <strong>Minnesota</strong>, October 1986/15 citing, In re Estate of Washburn, 20 N.W. 324, 325-26<br />

(1984)<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!