30.04.2015 Views

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Suppose, for example, that a married couple with an adjusted gross income of $300,000<br />

in 2013 wants to know the effective tax rate on an additional $20,000 of gross income.<br />

Although the couple’s marginal tax rate on the extra $30,000 would be 33% under the 2013 tax<br />

tables, the $30,000 excess will also cause the couple to lose $900 in itemized deductions. That<br />

effectively increases their taxable income by $900, resulting in $300 more tax (33% x $900). The<br />

total tax on the extra $30,000 would thus be $10,900, an effective rate of 36.33%. It may well<br />

be the extra tax does not deter the couple from earning the additional income, but most clients<br />

would likely want to be made aware of the added cost.<br />

5. Planning for the Wealthy<br />

In addition to the net investment income tax and the application of the overall limitation<br />

on itemized deductions, wealthy taxpayers have to deal with the return of the 39.6% bracket<br />

and a less preferential tax rate of 20% on adjusted net capital gain. 6 While taxes are just one<br />

factor to consider in making and managing investments, of course, ATRA has made taxes a<br />

more important factor. Accordingly, some of the following strategies may be worth considering.<br />

First, clients may wish to invest more heavily in tax‐exempt municipal bonds, keeping in<br />

mind that interest from some municipal bonds is a preference item for purposes of the<br />

alternative minimum tax purposes and that some states impose income tax on the interest<br />

from municipalities outside of the state.<br />

Second, clients may want to harvest capital losses in order to offset gains that could be<br />

taxed at 23.8%. This is consistent with the advice we were giving clients at the end of 2012,<br />

when we told them to accelerate capital gains into 2012 (to be taxed at 15% instead of the<br />

23.8% rate we were expecting for 2013) and to defer capital losses into 2013 and beyond. 7<br />

Third, clients have more incentive to channel tax‐challenged assets into tax‐deferred<br />

vehicles. While municipal bonds and stocks held for long‐term growth may be perfectly fine<br />

inside of trusts taxed as separate entities, taxable bonds and mutual funds with high turnover<br />

are better‐suited for pension plans, individual retirement accounts, and tax‐deferred annuities.<br />

Fourth, working clients should keep making maximum contributions to qualified<br />

retirement plans. The more that passes to the plan, the lower the client’s adjusted gross<br />

income (and, hence, taxable income).<br />

6 As before, of course, other components of net capital gain are taxed at less preferential rates. So‐called<br />

“unrecaptured section 1250 gain” continues to be taxed at 25% or the taxpayer’s marginal rate, whichever is less.<br />

Similarly, “collectibles gain” and “section 1202 stock gain” continue to be taxed at 28% or the taxpayer’s marginal<br />

rate, whichever is less.<br />

7 It’s nice when our advice proves to be correct, isn’t it?<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!