30.04.2015 Views

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

E. Restrictions on <strong>Trust</strong>ee Mischief. Although, as discussed below, trustees must<br />

exercise the decanting power only with due regard to the trustee’s fiduciary<br />

duties, some statutes contain specific provisions restricting a trustee’s ability to<br />

decant in a manner that might benefit the trustee as a fiduciary, for example, by<br />

allowing for increased trustee fees.<br />

1. <strong>Trust</strong>ee Compensation. The New York statute provides that unless a<br />

court otherwise directs, the decanting power may not be exercised to<br />

change the provisions regarding the determination of the compensation of<br />

any trustee. The Ohio statute permits a change in trustee compensation<br />

either with court approval or with the consent of all persons who are<br />

current beneficiaries of the second trust. See also Michigan § 700.7820a.<br />

The Illinois statute prohibits decanting solely to change the provisions<br />

regarding trustee compensation but permits decanting “in conjunction with<br />

other valid and reasonable purposes to bring the trustee’s compensation in<br />

accord with reasonable limits in accord with Illinois law in effect at the<br />

time of the exercise.” Most of the state decanting statutes are silent on the<br />

issue of trustee compensation.<br />

2. <strong>Trust</strong>ee Fee for Decanting. The Illinois statute also prohibits the trustee<br />

from receiving a special fee for decanting.<br />

3. <strong>Trust</strong>ee Liability. The Illinois statute also prohibits decanting to decrease<br />

or indemnify against a trustee’s liability or exonerate a trustee from<br />

liability for failure to exercise reasonable care, diligence and prudence.<br />

See also the proposed Alaska amendment, which has a similar restriction<br />

unless a court otherwise directs.<br />

4. <strong>Trust</strong>ee Removal Provisions. The Illinois statute specifically prohibits<br />

decanting to eliminate a provision granting a person a right to remove or<br />

replace the decanting trustee under most circumstances. See also the<br />

proposed Alaska amendment, which has a similar restriction unless a court<br />

otherwise directs.<br />

5. Asset Valuation. The proposed amendment to the Alaska decanting<br />

statute would also prohibit decanting to “fix as binding and conclusive the<br />

value of an asset for purposes of distribution, allocation, or otherwise . . .”<br />

§ 13.36.158(i)(4).<br />

VI.<br />

Notice<br />

A. No Notice. A large number of states do not require the trustee to provide notice<br />

to the beneficiaries of the old trust before decanting. See, e.g., Arizona,<br />

Delaware, Michigan § 556.115a, Missouri, Nevada, South Dakota and Tennessee.<br />

New Hampshire requires notice only to charity. The Nevada statute states that the<br />

trustee may give notice to the beneficiaries.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!