30.04.2015 Views

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

standard, but saves the rest for the remainder beneficiaries, usually the children and other<br />

descendants from the marriage. Absent a credit shelter trust, dead spouses who leave<br />

everything to their surviving spouses risk the Fabio Effect (i.e., the surviving spouse meeting<br />

and marrying a new, better lover who then receives the entirety of the estate despite the<br />

furious whirring sound heard at the grave of the first spouse to die).<br />

• Related to the last point, credit shelter trusts usually offer a degree of protection<br />

against the creditors of the surviving spouse that outright bequests to the surviving spouse<br />

would lack.<br />

• Sometimes credit shelter trusts are helpful in providing for the professional<br />

management of assets. The first spouse dies content knowing that the assets will not be<br />

depleted too quickly.<br />

• Credit shelter trusts will still be employed to utilize the generation‐skipping transfer<br />

tax exemption of the first spouse to die. There is no portability of any unused GSTT exemption<br />

to the surviving spouse.<br />

• As explained above, there is a risk that portability may not survive to 2013 or beyond.<br />

Even if the expiration date is extended or removed, there is always the chance the statute could<br />

be amended to make portability less attractive. 30<br />

Steve Akers offers additional reasons for the continued use of credit shelter trusts:<br />

(c) the deceased spousal unused exclusion amount may decrease if the basic<br />

estate exclusion amount is later reduced by Congress (because the DSUE<br />

Amount to be applied at any particular time cannot exceed the basic estate tax<br />

exclusion amount), (d) the unused exclusion from a particular predeceased<br />

spouse will be lost if the surviving spouse remarries and survives his or her next<br />

spouse, … [and] (g) there is no statute of limitations on values for purposes of<br />

determining the unused exclusion amount that begins to run from the time the<br />

first deceased spouse’s estate tax return is filed whereas the statute of<br />

limitations does run on values if a bypass trust is funded at the first spouse’s<br />

death…. 31<br />

30 In fairness, this same risk faces credit shelter trusts—Congress could always change the Code in such a way that<br />

credit shelter trusts became more disadvantageous than the portability election. But we have had credit shelter<br />

trusts for decades and the portability election is the new kid on the block. Which one do you think Congress would<br />

tinker with first? Aren’t rhetorical questions annoying?<br />

31 Steve R. Akers, Estate Planning Current Developments 60 (2011) (copy on file with the author).<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!