30.04.2015 Views

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Small Estates Panel<br />

Peter M. Hendricks<br />

Garvey, Boggio & Hendricks, P.A.<br />

Medical Assistance Provided to Predeceased Spouse and Claims Against the Estates of Surviving<br />

Spouses<br />

A. Medical Assistance recipient died prior to July 1, 2009<br />

1. If the surviving spouse also died prior to July 1, 2009, then the case is controlled by<br />

the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Supreme Court decision of In re Estate of Francis E. Barg, 752 N.W.2d<br />

52 (Minn. 2008) and the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Court of Appeals decision of In re Estate of<br />

Richard L. Perrin, 796 N.W.2d 175 (Minn. App. 2011). Barg holds that the amount<br />

of the Medical Assistance claim that can recovered from the surviving spouse’s estate<br />

is limited to the value of assets that transferred to the surviving spouse as a result of<br />

the death of the Medical Assistance recipient. Perrin holds that the County is barred<br />

by the doctrine of collateral estoppel from relitigating an issue argued in Barg.<br />

2. If the surviving spouse died after July 1, 2009, the county may attempt to apply the<br />

2009 amendments to Minn. Stat. § 519.05 as the basis of recovering Medical<br />

Assistance benefits from the surviving spouse’s estate. Following the Barg decision,<br />

the <strong>Minnesota</strong> Legislature amended Minn. Stat. §§ 256B.15 (Medical Assistance<br />

estate recovery statute) and 519.05 (spousal liability statute) seeking to expand<br />

Medical Assistance estate recovery. The amendments to Minn. Stat. § 256B.15 only<br />

apply to Medical Assistance recipients who died on or after July 1, 2009. The 2009<br />

amendment to Minn. Stat. § 519.05(a) only added the following language:<br />

“…including any claims arising under section … 256B.15 …”<br />

3. In re: Estate of Donald K. Ruddick, Ramsey County District Court File No.: 62-PR-<br />

10-183 (March 2, 2012). This is the first known district court decision involving a<br />

Medical Assistance claim against the estate of a surviving spouse who died after July<br />

1, 2009 for Medical Assistance provided solely to a predeceased spouse who died<br />

prior to July 1, 2009.<br />

Janis Ruddick received Medical Assistance benefits in the amount of $165,504.63<br />

and she died in March 2008 survived by her husband, Donald. The only asset in<br />

which Janis had any ownership interest was a jointly owned bank account with<br />

Donald. After payment of funeral and burial expenses, the remaining balance in the<br />

account was $860.64. Donald died in January 2012. The County filed a Written<br />

Statement of Claim in Donald’s estate for $165,504.63 and pursuant to Minn. Stat. §§<br />

256B.15 and 519.05. The <strong>Minnesota</strong> Department of Human Services intervened as a<br />

party. The Estate allowed the claim in the amount of $860.64 based on Barg.<br />

The Estate argued the County is collaterally estopped from relitigating the Medical<br />

Assistance claim under Minn. Stat. § 519.05 because the issue had already been<br />

litigated and decided in Barg and Perrin. The County and DHS argued that the<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!