30.04.2015 Views

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

Probate & Trust Law Section Conference Manual ... - Minnesota CLE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

or more. If you fund a credit shelter trust up front on the first spouse to die and if<br />

the assets appreciate significantly, the capital gains tax or income tax may exceed<br />

the estate tax on the second spouse’s death if you just retained the asset until the<br />

survivor’s death.<br />

1. Example 1. H dies in 2011 and a credit shelter trust is funded with<br />

$1,000,000. The DSUE to W is $4,000,000. If the trust appreciates to<br />

$5,000,000 by the time W dies the capital gains alone will be at least<br />

$800,000 when the estate taxes would have been zero. In this case,<br />

holding the assets and using the portability provisions is better tax<br />

management. (Of course, we are using a crystal ball to see the future first).<br />

2. Example 2. Alternatively to example 1, if a credit shelter trust is only<br />

funded to $1,000,000, if the balance of the estate is allocated to the<br />

surviving spouse, the surviving spouse’s estate may pay higher federal and<br />

state estate taxes by running up the brackets if all assets are held in the<br />

survivor’s estate. H1 dies with $1,000,000 in a credit shelter trust and<br />

$4,000,000 to the spouse (and $4,000,000 DSUE amount to spouse).<br />

When spouse dies the $4,000,000 appreciates to $12,000,000. In this case<br />

the taxes are higher both state and federal than if they had been taxed only<br />

at the state level on the first spouse’s death.<br />

D. Ante-nuptial Agreements. We may want to consider the use of portability in antenuptial<br />

agreements. If the executor of a deceased spouse refuses to file an estate<br />

tax return or elect portability a great deal of tax benefit can be lost, perhaps only<br />

due to spite. An ante-nuptial agreement might want to include agreements to elect<br />

portability. Gift splitting may also become a bigger issue with portability and the<br />

parties may or may not want to mandate gift-splitting.<br />

E. There is a 3 part series of articles entitled Portability - Part One<br />

(http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/events/real_property_trust_estate/h<br />

eckerling/2012/heckerling_report_2012_portability_part_one.authcheckdam.pdf),<br />

Portability – The Regulations<br />

(http://meetings.abanet.org/webupload/commupload/RP512500/otherlinks_files/p<br />

ortability_the_regulations_2013_01_14_paper_1.authcheckdam.pdf) , and<br />

Portability – The Game Changer<br />

(http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/events/real_property_trust_estate/h<br />

eckerling/2013/portability_the_game_changer_2013_01_15_paper_2.authcheckda<br />

m.pdf ).<br />

These were published by the American Bar Association and primarily authored by<br />

Richard S. Franklin, Lester B. <strong>Law</strong>, and George D. Karibjanian. These articles<br />

provide a more detailed examination of the portability issues and estate planning<br />

considerations.<br />

- 10 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!