10.07.2015 Views

MAP-01-011 HFI Technical Guide - Human Factors Integration ...

MAP-01-011 HFI Technical Guide - Human Factors Integration ...

MAP-01-011 HFI Technical Guide - Human Factors Integration ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Annex 3 – HF Techniques, Methods and ToolsA3.6 Mental Workload Assessment TechniquesThe increased use of technology within the world we live today places anincreased demand upon the operators of modern systems and the assessment ofmental workload (MWL) is therefore of the utmost importance during the design,development and evaluation of new systems. Within a military environment,Command and Control personnel are subjected to demands imposes anincreased demand on the users of assessment of mental workload.There are a broad range of assessment techniques that can be used to assessMWL and influence design during the development of a system as well as toassess the impact of MWL on an existing system. These include:• Physiological measures• Primary and Secondary task performance measures• Task Load Index (NASA-TLX)• Defence Research Agency Workload Scales (DRAWS)• Subjective Workload Assessment Technique (SWAT)• Subjective Workload Dominance (SWORD)• Workload Profile Technique• Cognitive Task Load Analysis• Pro-SWORD• Modified Cooper-Harper Scales• Individual Self-Assessment (ISA)The following sub-sections provide an overview of the identified 4 MWLtechniques.A3.6.1Physiological measuresThe use of physiological measures as indicators of MWL is based upon theassumption that as task demand increases, marked changes in various operatorphysiological systems are apparent. There are numerous physiologicalmeasurement techniques available to the HF analyst including heart rate, heartrate variability, endogenous blink rate, brain activity, electro-dermal response,eye movements, papillary responses and event-related potentials. Many of thesetechniques are intrusive, and require specialist equipment and specialistoperators to conduct the tests and analyse the results. Thus they belong to thelaboratory, rather than the industrial workplace.4 For details see ‘<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Factors</strong> Design & Evaluation Methods Review’ [Ref 32].May 2006 Page A3-43 Issue 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!