11.07.2015 Views

California State Rail Plan 2007-08 to 2017-18

California State Rail Plan 2007-08 to 2017-18

California State Rail Plan 2007-08 to 2017-18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>2007</strong>-<strong>08</strong> – <strong>2017</strong>-<strong>18</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>Figure 8CCAPITOL CORRIDORAnnual Operating Performance - <strong>State</strong> Fiscal Years<strong>State</strong> Ridership Data Financial Data for OperationsFiscalTrain Loss FareboxYear Ridership PM/TM Revenue Expense Loss <strong>State</strong> Cost Amtrak Cost per PM RatioNotes (F1) (F2) (F3) (F4) (F5) (F6)1991-92 (S1) 173,672 96.3 $ 1,973,255 $ 4,848,967 $ 2,875,712 $ 1,592,90715.0¢ 40.7%1992-93 238,785 67.7 $ 2,970,103 $ 8,333,093 $ 5,362,990 $ 6,712,01720.1¢ 35.6%1993-94 364,070 101.2 $ 3,598,978 $ 9,911,735 $ 6,312,757 $ 6,714,761 $ 1,697,460 15.7¢ 36.3%1994-95 (S2) 349,056 101.7 $ 3,757,146 $ 9,678,401 $ 5,921,255 $ 6,012,315 $ 1,584,692 14.9¢ 38.8%1995-96 (S3) 403,050 111.9 $ 4,805,072 $ 11,077,485 $ 6,272,413 $ 6,434,940 $ 273,025 14.9¢ 43.4%1996-97 496,586 111.3 $ 5,938,072 $ 20,509,999 $ 14,571,927 $ 9,701,519 $ 4,871,345 31.6¢ 29.0%1997-98 (S4) 484,458 109.4 $ 6,212,150 $ 20,597,133 $ 14,384,983 $ 10,830,123 $ 3,555,755 31.8¢ 30.2%1998-99 (S5) 515,768 90.8 $ 6,939,702 $ 22,343,915 $ 15,404,213 $ 14,543,722 $ 969,291 32.6¢ 31.1%1999-00 (S6) 684,334 90.1 $ 8,546,453 $ 25,048,098 $ 16,501,645 $ 17,120,868 $ 194,932 28.2¢ 34.1%2000-01 (S7) 1,030,837 106.0 $ 11,091,742 $ 27,670,759 $ 16,579,017 $ <strong>18</strong>,558,681 $ 92,014 21.0¢ 40.1%2001-02 1,090,713 96.9 $ 12,321,755 $ 32,683,794 $ 20,362,039 $ 21,263,811 $ 99,311 25.3¢ 37.7%2002-03 (S8) 1,129,683 92.0 $ 12,550,<strong>18</strong>2 $ 35,390,303 $ 22,840,121 $ 22,413,396 $ 170,254 28.1¢ 35.5%2003-04 1,148,047 86.3 $ 13,012,806 $ 36,231,990 $ 23,219,<strong>18</strong>4 $ 23,168,004 $ 9,584 28.0¢ 35.9%2004-05 1,239,<strong>08</strong>2 93.1 $ 14,788,299 $ 39,160,356 $ 24,372,057 $ 24,372,05727.3¢ 37.8%2005-06 1,269,964 95.5 $ 15,740,506 $ 38,759,149 $ 23,0<strong>18</strong>,643 $ 23,0<strong>18</strong>,64324.9¢ 40.6%TOTAL 10,6<strong>18</strong>,105 $ 124,246,221 $ 342,245,177 $ 217,998,956 $ 212,457,764(S1)(S2)(S3)(S4)(S5)(S6)(S7)(S8)Service started 12/12/91 with three <strong>State</strong>-supported round trips between Sacramen<strong>to</strong> and San Jose,with one round trip extended <strong>to</strong> Roseville. Data is for six and one-half months only.One round trip discontinued 4/2/95 between Oakland and San Jose (except on Saturday northbound andFriday, Saturday, Sunday southbound.) Feeder bus connection substituted for train.Fourth round trip added 4/14/96 between Sacramen<strong>to</strong> and Oakland.Effective 6/17/96, round trip referred <strong>to</strong> in (S2) above res<strong>to</strong>red <strong>to</strong> daily service between Oakland and San Jose.Effective 1/26/98, the round trip that previously originated and terminated at Roseville was extended <strong>to</strong> Colfax.Fifth round trip added 10/25/98 and sixth round trip added 2/21/99 between Sacramen<strong>to</strong> and Oakland.Effective 2/27/00, seventh round trip added between Sacramen<strong>to</strong> and Oakland; fourth round trip added between Oakland andSan Jose; the round trip <strong>to</strong> Colfax was cut back <strong>to</strong> Auburn.Effective 4/29/01, eighth and ninth round trips added between Sacramen<strong>to</strong> and Oakland;fifth and sixth round trips added between Oakland and San Jose on weekends only.Effective 10/27/02, tenth round trip added; effective 1/6/03, eleventh round trip added; effective 4/28/03, twelfth round tripadded. These additional trains operate weekdays only between Sacramen<strong>to</strong> and Oakland.(F1)(F2)Passenger-miles per train mile (PM/TM), a measure of the average load on a train over its entire route.Through September 1995, all trains billed on long term avoidable cost basis; includes cost of connecting buses.Effective Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 1996, all trains billed on Full Cost (Train, Route and System) Basis.(F3) Though September 1995, <strong>State</strong> cost was 65 percent of train operating loss. Between Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 1995 andSeptember 1996, <strong>State</strong> cost was 100 percent of train operating loss. Between Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 1996 and September 1997,<strong>State</strong> cost was 55 percent of the train operating loss. Effective Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 1997, <strong>State</strong> is billed contractually specifiedpercentages of most individual cost elements, plus a fixed amount for certain other cost elements. Also includes <strong>State</strong>payment of costs of special agreements with Amtrak for use of equipment, special payments for service continuationand <strong>State</strong> payment for entire net cost of all connecting bus routes. Effective Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 1999, the Capi<strong>to</strong>l Corridor JointPowers Authority (CCJPA) and Amtrak entered in<strong>to</strong> a 12 month fixed price operating contract, including all train andbus services. The <strong>State</strong> Costs shown represent the fixed price contract payment less any performance assessments.(F4) Between <strong>State</strong> Fiscal Years 1993-94 and 2003-04, Amtrak cost is based on billings submitted and reflects cost bases andAmtrak shares as stated in notes (F2) and (F3) above. However, Amtrak does not include the unbilled Amtrak share of fixed cost elements.Prior <strong>to</strong> FY 1993-94, data <strong>to</strong> calculate Amtrak cost is not available; beginning in FY 2004-05, no Amtrak share is billed.(F5) Train loss (deficit) per train passenger-mile. Connecting buses not included in loss per passenger mile data.(F6) Farebox Ratio, the ratio of Revenue <strong>to</strong> Expense.132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!