11.07.2015 Views

California State Rail Plan 2007-08 to 2017-18

California State Rail Plan 2007-08 to 2017-18

California State Rail Plan 2007-08 to 2017-18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>2007</strong>-<strong>08</strong> – <strong>2017</strong>-<strong>18</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>• SHA Non-Article XIX Revenues – The TCRP Program (Chapter 91,Statutes of 2000) authorized the annual transfer, starting in 2001-02, of allArticle XIX unrestricted SHA revenues from the SHA <strong>to</strong> the PTA.These revenues are derived from the sale of documents, charges formiscellaneous services <strong>to</strong> the public, rental of state property, etc.In 2005-06 this source was $81 million.• Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP)/Proposition 42 Funding –The TCRP, established by Chapter 91, Statutes of 2000 (AB 2928,Torlakson), was intended <strong>to</strong> provide funding for 141 transportation projectsand <strong>to</strong> the PTA from 2001-02 through 2005-06. These projects were <strong>to</strong>relieve congestion, connect transportation systems, and provide for bettergoods movement. The major new source of funding was the shifting ofgasoline sales tax revenues from the General Fund <strong>to</strong> the newly createdTIF. The first call on TIF distributions was <strong>to</strong> fund annual TrafficCongestion Relief Fund (TCRF) transfers, and then 20 percent of theremaining balance would be transferred <strong>to</strong> the PTA. The state experienceda fiscal crisis soon after the TCRP was enacted. Chapter 112, Statutes of2001 (AB 438) delayed the transfer of sales tax revenues <strong>to</strong> the TIF,beginning in 2003-04 and continuing through <strong>2007</strong>-<strong>08</strong>; however, theseamounts were fully repaid by 2006-<strong>2007</strong>.In March 2002, Proposition 42 added Article XIX B <strong>to</strong> the <strong>California</strong>Constitution that eliminated the original sunset date for the TIF and delayedTCRP funding from 2003-04 through <strong>2007</strong>-<strong>08</strong>. Proposition 42 madepermanent, beginning in 20<strong>08</strong>-09, the transfer of gasoline sales tax revenue<strong>to</strong> the TIF on a formula basis: 20 percent of the transfers will go <strong>to</strong> thePTA, with one-half of this amount for STIP projects and one-half <strong>to</strong> <strong>State</strong>Transit Assistance (STA) for transit; 40 percent <strong>to</strong> the TIF for STIPprojects; and 40 percent for subventions <strong>to</strong> cities and counties for localstreets and roads. Fiscal year <strong>2007</strong>-<strong>08</strong> is the last year of statu<strong>to</strong>ry transfersof Proposition 42 funding <strong>to</strong> the TCRF. Beginning in 20<strong>08</strong>-09, no furtherfunds will go <strong>to</strong> TCRP projects, thus increasing formula funds <strong>to</strong> the PTA,STIP, and local streets and roads. In 2003-04 and 2004-05, the transferswere suspended; however, these were repaid in 2006-07 (per Proposition1A) by the transfer of $1.415 billion <strong>to</strong> the Transportation DeferredInvestment Fund (TDIF) and the commitment <strong>to</strong> pay $83 million per yearfor nine years <strong>to</strong> the TCRP.REPAYMENT OF THE PTAThe statutes (AB 1751, Chapter 224, Statutes of 2003) and (AB 687, Chapter 91,Statutes of 2004) specified that the TIF suspensions in 2003-04 and 2004-05 wereloans that were required <strong>to</strong> be repaid from the General Fund via TransportationDeferred Investment Fund (TDIF) by 20<strong>08</strong>-09. In July 2006, the General Fund194

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!