11.07.2015 Views

California State Rail Plan 2007-08 to 2017-18

California State Rail Plan 2007-08 to 2017-18

California State Rail Plan 2007-08 to 2017-18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>2007</strong>-<strong>08</strong> – <strong>2017</strong>-<strong>18</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>for train service, and Norfolk Southern agreed <strong>to</strong> compensate the state over a 20-year period based on its use of the bridge.The Shellpot Bridge will be the first <strong>to</strong>ll bridge for railroad cars in the country.Through a <strong>to</strong>ll system, Norfolk Southern will repay DelDOT over the next20 years. An electronic scanner will count the number of rail cars that cross thebridge by reading a magnetic placard that is mounted on every railcar. This typeof "bar scanning technology" (similar <strong>to</strong> a grocery s<strong>to</strong>re checkout line) is currentlyused by rail companies <strong>to</strong> keep tabs on cars along many thousands of miles oftrack across North America. Shellpot will become the first facility <strong>to</strong> takeadvantage of this <strong>to</strong> charge, and collect a <strong>to</strong>ll. Norfolk Southern will pay DelDOTan annual minimum, regardless of traffic. The sliding scale adopted has the <strong>to</strong>llranging from $35 per car for the first 5,000 that cross the bridge annually, <strong>to</strong> only$5 per car after 50,000 crossings.These examples could provide insights in<strong>to</strong> additional funding strategies forconsideration in <strong>California</strong>.USER FEESThe <strong>California</strong> Legislature—concerned about the impacts of goods movementactivities on adjacent communities, and the lack of resources directed <strong>to</strong>addressing these impacts—advanced several bills during the <strong>2007</strong> legislativesession.On of them, Senate Bill 974, would require the Ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach,and Oakland <strong>to</strong> collect a user fee on the owner of container cargo moving throughthe Port of Los Angeles, the Port of Long Beach, or the Port of Oakland at a rateof $30 per twenty-foot equivalent unit (TEU) or $60 per forty-foot equivalent unit(FEU). The bill would require the fees be used <strong>to</strong> fund projects for all modes thatimprove the flow and efficiency of container cargo <strong>to</strong> and from those ports.It is estimated that $500 million would be generated annually for these projects,including freight rail. This revenue stream could be a potential source of freightrail project funding, and might include the short line railroad industry, whichserves these ports. SB 974 is currently on the “inactive” file. Whether or not it isultimately adopted and signed by the Governor, this bill and its companionlegislation highlight the intent of the legislature <strong>to</strong> attempt <strong>to</strong> find solutions <strong>to</strong>funding environmental mitigation for goods movement projects that does notdepend solely on existing transportation or emissions reduction funding sources.254

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!