11.07.2015 Views

California State Rail Plan 2007-08 to 2017-18

California State Rail Plan 2007-08 to 2017-18

California State Rail Plan 2007-08 to 2017-18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter XVI – Major Freight Issuesmarketing, efficient operation and financial support can help, the crucialrequirement will be the profitable handling of carload traffic for the Class I roads.Short line interface with the Class I <strong>Rail</strong>roads in <strong>California</strong>, the Union Pacific<strong>Rail</strong>road (UPRR) and Burling<strong>to</strong>n Northern Santa Fe <strong>Rail</strong>way (BNSF), is at timesproblematic. Interface in this case meaning pick up and delivery of mostly mixedcarload commodities. In conversations with the <strong>California</strong> Short Line <strong>Rail</strong>roadAssociation (CSLRRA) they state that the Class Is for the most part providerelatively good service and that <strong>to</strong> say there’s a larger problem in <strong>California</strong> is notquite accurate. The Class Is are generally not geared <strong>to</strong>wards providing the sameservice level <strong>to</strong> all cus<strong>to</strong>mers, so generally speaking the smallest cus<strong>to</strong>mers don’tget quite the same level of service as larger cus<strong>to</strong>mers who provide regular,predictable, larger volumes.TRACK INFRASTRUCTURE CAPABILITYA major trend in the railroad industry is the use of heavier rail cars as a means ofmaximizing load potential, thereby generating cost savings. The upper limit ofthese new car weights has been increased <strong>to</strong> 286,000 pounds and in some cases <strong>to</strong>315,000 pounds. To handle these heavier cars, short lines must have track,roadbed, and bridges capable of handling the increased loads. This means asubstantial investment that many short lines cannot afford given the limitedrevenues that they earn moving cars between shippers and the Class I railroads.Without the necessary infrastructure, many of the commodities moving by rail<strong>to</strong>day have <strong>to</strong> be hauled by trucks <strong>to</strong> and from transload facilities located at majorrailroads. This shift from short line rail <strong>to</strong> trucks will further congest the <strong>State</strong>’shighway system, create more traffic delays, and increase air pollution and highwaymaintenance costs. The loss of revenue <strong>to</strong> short line railroads could force some <strong>to</strong>go out of business leaving some <strong>California</strong> rail shippers without rail services.The additional truck transportation costs will have <strong>to</strong> be passed on <strong>to</strong> consumers,making goods more costly <strong>to</strong> purchase.CAPITAL AVAILABILITYSecuring adequate funding for infrastructure upgrades and other capitalinvestments is the most pressing issue for independently owned and operated shortlines. Some short line railroads were spin-offs from the Class I railroads and werealready suffering from years of deferred maintenance when created. Maintenanceof-wayprocedures on these railroads typically are highly labor intensive andexpensive. Because short line railroads operate on low profit margins they areunable <strong>to</strong> take on major infrastructure improvement projects. The major freightrailroads are pursuing such strategies as legislation <strong>to</strong> allow them <strong>to</strong> claim taxcredits for infrastructure and equipment investments. They believe that the currentsystem, which limits or prohibits this, places them in an unfair competitiveadvantage compared <strong>to</strong> others in the goods movement sec<strong>to</strong>r.231

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!