11.07.2015 Views

Newfoundland and Labrador Product Development Strategy

Newfoundland and Labrador Product Development Strategy

Newfoundland and Labrador Product Development Strategy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 212 -o Occupancy/utilization rates can’t be the only consideration on BDP applications. Lowoccupancy may be because there is not enough supply for the market to consider the areaas an overnight destination. Supply, quality, product appeal, traffic volumes <strong>and</strong>occupancy rates are all relevant considerations. Also, whether the new productdiversifies the product available at the destination is another. The focus shouldn’t be justoccupancy. (This was addressed in Section 9.)o Not-for-profits (NFPs) <strong>and</strong> community projects are getting money too easily, <strong>and</strong> toomuch - while private sector is finding it too difficult, too onerous <strong>and</strong> too little.o Don’t fund NFPs that compete with the private sector without significant differentiationin product offer.o Don’t fund NFP/community projects that haven’t got assured operational fundingcommitted, or at least a reasonable <strong>and</strong> realistic plan in place in this regard.o Don’t under-fund projects to stretch dollars if it weakens the project, <strong>and</strong> particularly if itputs the operator under financial duress. Do it right.Other suggestions we would offer to ACOA are summarized below:o Private sector projects that are significant dem<strong>and</strong> generators or influencers for tourismshould be eligible for some portion of their funding to be non-repayable. This wouldapply to non-commercial elements of the project, such as infrastructure <strong>and</strong> amenitiesthat contribute to dem<strong>and</strong> but not directly to revenue.o For key strategic projects, a broader range of financing alternatives should be available,including ‘soft’ financing such as equity. Also higher percentages than 50% should bepossible in these cases.o The SCIF <strong>and</strong> BDP programs both continue to merit the same attention to addressingnegative impacts on competing products/programs.o We recommend that ACOA be a partner in other initiatives discussed later in this section.Financing IncentivesDITRD, in cooperation with the Department of Finance administers the EDGE Program <strong>and</strong> theDirect Equity Tax Credit program, as discussed in Section 3.Investors also can have the option of making their tourism investments into self-directed RRSPsas well, providing them with a tax shelter.It will be important for tourism product development staff to become familiar with these options<strong>and</strong> encourage their use where they apply.It would be helpful if experts in investment incentives could be engaged to bring forward newideas <strong>and</strong> new concepts that could assist with tourism product development.THE ECONOMIC PLANNING GROUP of Canada <strong>Newfoundl<strong>and</strong></strong> & <strong>Labrador</strong> Tourism <strong>Product</strong> <strong>Development</strong>D. W. Knight Associates <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>and</strong> Accommodation Needs Study

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!