11.07.2015 Views

Newfoundland and Labrador Product Development Strategy

Newfoundland and Labrador Product Development Strategy

Newfoundland and Labrador Product Development Strategy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 213 -General ConclusionsOther conclusions the consulting team has reached on development funding include thefollowing:o As mentioned earlier there is a need for both capital <strong>and</strong> operational support for natural<strong>and</strong> cultural attractions development.o Close the door when a particular opportunity is filled. Take care to not supportoverbuilding.o Funding agencies could benefit from coaching on incentives <strong>and</strong> how to bundle them,particularly for proactive initiativeso We need to get over the thinking that all communities/areas are deserving of support fortourism development – that refusing a community support is condemning it. That policyframework is simply unfeasible <strong>and</strong> destructive to viability <strong>and</strong> sustainability. The onlysustainable policy is to build on strengths – communities that can really becomedestinations, hubs <strong>and</strong> service centres <strong>and</strong> make them strong with critical mass. This isthe cluster concept, which is key to success <strong>and</strong> sustainability. Section 7 addressed thisissue.o The funding agencies need to develop an entrepreneurial, strategy/opportunity drivendevelopment process, to operate independently from application-based programs, such asthe Business <strong>Development</strong> Program <strong>and</strong> the not-for-profit/community developmentassistance programs under SCIF for example.Impact on Competitors IssueSupporting a tourism development project inevitably raises the question of ‘If you are helpingone project, are you hurting others catering to the same or similar markets?’Section 9 addressed the issue of how to address the competitive impact of new accommodationsprojects or expansions <strong>and</strong> proposed an approach to dealing with the challenge. In the text tofollow we have generalized <strong>and</strong> modified that approach to make it more general to fit productdevelopment more generally.First of all, it is important that the question of whether the issue of competitive impact should bean important consideration in dealing with a particular project. It shouldn’t be just that one ormore other operators object. There needs to be a more systematic assessment of this question ineach case. The discussion of this question with respect to ‘dem<strong>and</strong> generating’ development, <strong>and</strong>with ‘dem<strong>and</strong> influencing’ projects is important in this regard. Projects that meet a high st<strong>and</strong>ardof dem<strong>and</strong> generating/influencing should merit more emphasis on the strategic <strong>and</strong> economicbenefit side of the question <strong>and</strong> less on the competitive impact side.THE ECONOMIC PLANNING GROUP of Canada <strong>Newfoundl<strong>and</strong></strong> & <strong>Labrador</strong> Tourism <strong>Product</strong> <strong>Development</strong>D. W. Knight Associates <strong>Strategy</strong> <strong>and</strong> Accommodation Needs Study

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!