28.11.2012 Views

i A PHYSICAL IMPLEMENTATION WITH CUSTOM LOW POWER ...

i A PHYSICAL IMPLEMENTATION WITH CUSTOM LOW POWER ...

i A PHYSICAL IMPLEMENTATION WITH CUSTOM LOW POWER ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Read<br />

Power<br />

Erase<br />

Power<br />

Write<br />

Power<br />

8.4 RESULTS<br />

For our fundamental memory building block, we used the model of a 64 byte EEPROM memory<br />

built in a 0.35 um CMOS process operating at 5.0V. Table 8-1 shows the power-gated memory<br />

power simulation results. The table compares the power consumed by the active memory bank<br />

and the power-gated memory banks in a power-gated design. The address decoder overhead is<br />

also shown in the table. The total read power overhead is 298.12nW for a 2-bank memory,<br />

390.71nW for a 4-bank memory and 570.7nW for an 8-bank memory. The total write power<br />

overhead is 143.55nW for a 2-bank memory, 203.69nW for a 4-bank memory and 339.67nW for<br />

an 8-bank memory.<br />

Active Bank<br />

2 Bank<br />

Table 8-1: Power Gated Memory Simulation Results<br />

4 Bank<br />

(Bank Size 64 Bytes) (Bank Size 64 Bytes)<br />

Idle<br />

Bank<br />

(nW)<br />

Decoder<br />

Overhead<br />

(nW)<br />

Active<br />

Bank<br />

Idle<br />

Banks<br />

(nW)<br />

Decoder<br />

Overhead<br />

(nW)<br />

Active<br />

Bank<br />

8 Bank<br />

(Bank Size 64 bytes)<br />

Idle<br />

Banks<br />

(nW)<br />

Decoder<br />

Overhead<br />

(nW)<br />

700.68uW 9.77 288.35 700.68uW 29.30 361.41 700.68uW 68.37 502.33<br />

12.51uW 4.03 135.53 12.51uW 12.09 179.62 12.51uW 28.22 283.49<br />

10.08mW 3.99 10.08mW 11.98 10.08mW 27.96<br />

148

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!