Untitled

Humanitarian Law Centerja until the end and I think that we all stayed; I think that nobody left earlier.”No further questions.EXAMINATION OF WITNESS SLOBODAN MEDIĆWitness SLOBODAN MEDIĆ, with personal details the same as given in therecord from the previous procedure made on 28 March 2002, knows thedefendant, not related to him, warned, took the oath, warned pursuant toArticle 100 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC), and he gives the followingstatement.His statement is identical to the one he gave on 28 March 2002 and uponthe presiding judge’s question, he says:“We were in a house some 350 or 400 metres away when we hear theshooting. When we heard the shots, we were commenting on what type ofweapons those were. I recognised it was a machine gun - 84. Since my unitdid not have weapons of that kind, I concluded that they did not shoot. Beforeand after these shots, we heard sporadic gunfire - short gunfire burstfrom light weapons. My unit had automatic rifles.When I came close to the scene, or the place where the buses were parked,I saw an ambulance parked some 100 metres away and I saw a doctor providingfirst aid treatment to two women or two girls. I saw many diversesoldiers and police officers there. My soldiers were there, too, but I cannotrecall whom exactly did I see at the scene of the crime. I do not know if defendantSaša Cvjetan was at the scene. My brother Dragan Medić was alsothere and I think he was standing closer to the buses with some SAJ membersand our guys, but I cannot remember the exact location where he was.I asked what happened, but nobody answered. Then Tutinac arrived andtold me to gather my unit and take it back to Prolom Banja, which I did.It is possible that I yelled and cussed at my soldiers, but that was only becauseI was mad because they had left the buses. I think one of the guysgave me a logical explanation - that they got off the bus when they heard158