13.07.2015 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Podujevo 1999 – Beyond Reasonable DoubtSince parts of my statement given before the Prokuplje District Court,which are different from the statement I gave today, were presented to me,I give the following statement: As for the date, it is true that everything happenedin May and not in April as I said incorrectly. As for the prison guardMirjan Mijatović whom I mentioned earlier, I state that I do not rememberwhether he was inside the room or not. As for my entrance inside theroom, I claim that I came close to the glass door and looked inside the roomand I am certain about whom I saw in there. I do not remember whether Iwent inside the room or not, but I do remember being in the area in frontof this room. As for the detail that I had not mentioned earlier when I wasexamined in relation to the investigative judge’s arrival and the arrival ofthe court reporter to my office before the interrogation I state that, whenI was examined in the court, I answered the questions asked by the judgeand these questions most likely did not head in that direction. I am certainthat attorney Šubaranović came to my office together with the investigativejudge and the court reporter after the interrogation was finished. JudgeBajović was coming to my office almost every day because the prison wasthe only institution that was not relocated during the state of the war.”The deputy district public prosecutor asked a question, to which the witnesssaid:“It is possible to see through the door the whole room in which the interrogationwas conducted because they are all placed towards the wall oppositefrom the door. It is not possible that somebody was sitting next tothe door because there are no tables and chairs there. At the time the prisonguards had to wear a uniform. It was mandatory.”Injured parties’ representative Nataša Kandić asked a question, to whichthe witness replied:“After attorney Šubaranović came to the prison building he could havegone inside the room where the interrogation was in process or to the dutyservice office because they are located next to one another, but I did not seewhich room the attorney went to. I exclude the possibility that Šubaranovićattended the examination of Cvjetan because he told me later on that heattended the examination of Demirović. I think that Judge Bajović had contactedthe defendant several more times after this interrogation, but I do245

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!