Untitled

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Humanitarian Law Centerhe acted in Cvjetan’s case and stated that Attorney Stanković waspresent even though he was not in the investigative judge’s office.There is a broad campaign at all levels of Serbian society and broad publicfor taking over certain cases from the Hague tribunal in which Serbsare defendants. The transfer of the “Vukovar Three” Case (Mrkšić, Radić,Šljivančanin) is especially popular these days.Even though there has been certain progress in Serbia and certain conditionsfor the trials of war criminals have been created (special courts andprosecutions have been created, legal regulations have been coordinated,optimal technical conditions have been created, and expert professionaland impartial first instance trial panels have been established), the anti-Hague lobby is still very strong, spread, and influential in Serbia. The SupremeCourt represents significant foothold, base, and the centre of theanti-Hague lobby in Serbia. Except for the dismissal of Presiding Judge Govedaricaand Judge Lelovac, this institution kept the same organisation as ithad during Slobodan Milošević’s regime. The Supreme Court Judges areformer chairmen of the courts, chiefs of criminal departments, and judgeswho administered the cases of major public and political interest duringMilošević’s regime. More than 90 per cent of today’s Supreme Court judicialstaff was elected at the time of Milošević’s regime.After 5 October 2000, the Supreme Court judges, greeted with great applause,loud cheers, and stamping of feet against the floor, the results oftheir General Session voting, by which they gave a vote of confidence inthe Supreme Court judge who gave the key contribution to the electoraltheft in Serbia in 1996.When the new presiding judge (elected after 5 October 2000) spoke badlyof Judge Goveadrica in the Supreme Court meetings, a group of judgesleft the meeting in protest.The last fabricated process, directed by the Milošević secret police, was thetrial of Vladimir Nikolić. The judges in charge of legal enquiring in Sjeverinand Podujevo cases, as well as one trial juror in the Podujevo case weremembers of Lelovac’s five member panel, which convicted Nikolić.220
Podujevo 1999 – Beyond Reasonable DoubtThe reasons for the Supreme Court’s latest decisions regarding the convictionsfor war crimes become clearer in this context and it reveals the anti-Hague position of this highest judicial institution in Serbia.221
Page 3:
Documents SeriesPodujevo 1999- Beyo
Page 7 and 8:
INTRODUCTIONThe book in front of yo
Page 9 and 10:
Podujevo 1999 - Beyond Reasonable D
Page 11 and 12:
KI 20/99Ki. No.________INTERROGATIO
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
The Republic of SerbiaDISTRICT PUBL
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
KI number 33/01WITNESS EXAMINATION
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Ki. number 33/01WITNESS EXAMINATION
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
The Republic of SerbiaDISTRICT PUBL
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
RECORD FROM THE MAIN HEARING(Before
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Kr. 716/02Serbian Supreme Court in
Page 103 and 104:
K.br. 792/02Kv.br. 391/03BELGRADE D
Page 105 and 106:
RECORD FROM THE MAIN HEARINGCompose
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
IDENTIFICATION RECORDComposed in th
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
RECORD FROM THE MAIN HEARINGCompose
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
K-number 792/02RECORD FROM THE MAIN
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172: Podujevo 1999 - Beyond Reasonable D
Page 201 and 202: HOW TO PROTECT WITNESSES WHO ARE SE
Page 211 and 212: KŽ I 1687/04Serbian Supreme Court
Page 221: Podujevo 1999 - Beyond Reasonable D
Page 259 and 260: K. br. 1823/04IN THE NAME OF THE PE
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Bogujevci Jehona, witness-injured p
Page 365 and 366:
DDabetić Mitar, a member of the Sp
Page 367 and 368:
Gashi Halim, owner of the house in
Page 369 and 370:
Kandić Nataša, the Humanitarian L
Page 371 and 372:
Milenković Vesna, dactylographer,
Page 373 and 374:
Poštić Zoran, Prokuplje District
Page 375 and 376:
ŠŠaponja Hadžić Milanka, a jour
Page 378:
Documents SeriesPodujevo 1999 - Beo
show all

Untitled

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?