21.08.2015 Views

Through the Eras

Edward Bleiberg ed., Ancient Egypt (2675-332 ... - The Fellowship

Edward Bleiberg ed., Ancient Egypt (2675-332 ... - The Fellowship

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Architecture and DesignModel rocker. BROOKLYN MUSEUM OF ART, 02.226, GIFT OF THE EGYPT EXPLORATION FUND. REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION.tuhotep III emphasizes this reality in that <strong>the</strong> leadercounts among his major accomplishments <strong>the</strong> fact that<strong>the</strong> entire crew returned safely to Egypt. This success isassociated with miracles, but clearly <strong>the</strong> Egyptians’ carefulstudy of <strong>the</strong> technical side of quarrying should receivemuch of <strong>the</strong> credit. For example, <strong>the</strong> Egyptiansdeveloped methods for quarrying both hard and softstones.CHISELS AND AXES. There was a development intools during <strong>the</strong> roughly 2,300 years from <strong>the</strong> Old Kingdom(2675–2170 B.C.E.) to <strong>the</strong> Ptolemaic Period(332–30 B.C.E.) as is evident in <strong>the</strong> different marks <strong>the</strong>chisels or axes left in different time periods. In <strong>the</strong> earlierperiod—<strong>the</strong> Old and Middle Kingdom—<strong>the</strong> marksare irregular lines that all curve in one direction. RosemarieKlemm, a German geologist who extensively studiedancient Egyptian quarries, suggested that <strong>the</strong>se linesare compatible with <strong>the</strong> soft copper chisels discovered byarchaeologists in Egypt, but Dieter Arnold, <strong>the</strong> Germanarchaeologist, posited that <strong>the</strong>se lines were more likely<strong>the</strong> marks of stone axes or picks. Early in <strong>the</strong> New Kingdom<strong>the</strong> lines left by tools in quarries are longer thanthose lines made during <strong>the</strong> Old and Middle Kingdoms.These New Kingdom lines also alternate in direction ina type of herringbone pattern, unlike <strong>the</strong> earlier lineswhich all curve in <strong>the</strong> same direction. R. Klemm suggested<strong>the</strong>se patterns match <strong>the</strong> harder bronze chiselswhich had already been in use in Egypt for o<strong>the</strong>r purposessince <strong>the</strong> Middle Kingdom (2008–1630 B.C.E.).Arnold again refuted Klemm’s chisel <strong>the</strong>ory and attributed<strong>the</strong> marks to stone picks or axes. In Ramesside timesand later (1292–1075 B.C.E.), <strong>the</strong> lines left by <strong>the</strong> toolschanged yet again, this time as closely set toge<strong>the</strong>r lines,longer than <strong>the</strong> marks made in previous times but againall curving in <strong>the</strong> same direction. These lines suggestedto Arnold <strong>the</strong> use of a pick-like instrument made of stonesince <strong>the</strong> only bronze chisel in use during this time periodwas shaped like a bar. Marks that match <strong>the</strong> barchisel are commonly found in rock-cut tombs; apparently<strong>the</strong> builders used <strong>the</strong> tool to cut a tunnel that <strong>the</strong>yformed into a tomb, ra<strong>the</strong>r than to cut blocks for building.Arnold’s suggestion would mean that only <strong>the</strong> tunnelingtool is currently known from archaeologicalArts and Humanities <strong>Through</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Eras</strong>: Ancient Egypt (2675 B.C.E.–332 B.C.E.) 53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!