21.08.2015 Views

Through the Eras

Edward Bleiberg ed., Ancient Egypt (2675-332 ... - The Fellowship

Edward Bleiberg ed., Ancient Egypt (2675-332 ... - The Fellowship

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LiteratureRichard Parkenson and Stephen Quirke, Papyrus (Austin,Tex.: University of Texas Press, 1995).THE AUTHORDETERMINING THE AUTHOR. Nearly all Egyptianworks of literature are anonymous. Even in works of wisdomor teaching attributed to famous sages of <strong>the</strong> past,it is never clear to modern readers whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong>“I” of a first person text is <strong>the</strong> actual author or whe<strong>the</strong>r<strong>the</strong> attribution to a famous sage is a literary device thatadds value to <strong>the</strong> advice given in <strong>the</strong> text. Though authorsare difficult to name, it is still possible to detect<strong>the</strong> voice of a real author behind many kinds of storiesand texts. The best method for finding <strong>the</strong> voice of anauthor, suggested by <strong>the</strong> French Egyptologist PhillipeDerchain, is to compare two or more texts that relatesimilar information. Yet even when <strong>the</strong>re is only one versionof a text, it is possible to appreciate <strong>the</strong> author’svoice.NARRATOR AND AUTHOR. Literary critics distinguishbetween <strong>the</strong> “I” of a first-person narrative, called<strong>the</strong> narrator, and <strong>the</strong> author of <strong>the</strong> text. In Egyptian literature,modern scholars have often supposed that <strong>the</strong>author was ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> person named as <strong>the</strong> “I” in <strong>the</strong> textor that <strong>the</strong> author was <strong>the</strong> scribe who wrote down anoral tradition. For example, Egyptologists once identified<strong>the</strong> author of <strong>the</strong> text called The Teachings of Ptahhotepwith a vizier who lived during <strong>the</strong> reign of KingDjedkare Isesy (2415–2371 B.C.E.) during <strong>the</strong> Old Kingdom,approximately 400 years before <strong>the</strong> text was composedin <strong>the</strong> Twelfth Dynasty. This attribution, inEgyptian thought, made <strong>the</strong> text more important. Modernculture attaches such importance to knowing <strong>the</strong> authorthat it seems unimaginable that <strong>the</strong> person whocomposed <strong>the</strong> text would attribute it to <strong>the</strong> long-deadvizier. Sometimes Egyptologists have thought that <strong>the</strong>author of <strong>the</strong> text was <strong>the</strong> scribe who wrote it down orwho owned it. Such is <strong>the</strong> case with <strong>the</strong> poem composedabout <strong>the</strong> Nineteenth-dynasty Battle of Qadesh. OlderEgyptologists thought that Pentawer, <strong>the</strong> scribe whowrote it down and possibly owned <strong>the</strong> papyrus, was <strong>the</strong>author. Derchain suggested that even <strong>the</strong> Egyptians becameconfused about this practice in <strong>the</strong> New Kingdom.In <strong>the</strong> Ramesside text known as Papyrus Chester Beatty,eight famous authors of <strong>the</strong> past are praised. Among<strong>the</strong>m is Ptahhotep, who almost certainly did not write<strong>the</strong> text that Ramesside readers had available. In <strong>the</strong> end,<strong>the</strong> anonymity of <strong>the</strong> majority of Egyptian authors issimilar to <strong>the</strong> anonymity of almost all Egyptian artists.AUTHOR’S ROLE. One way to assess <strong>the</strong> author’srole, suggested by Derchain, is to compare <strong>the</strong> way thatdifferent writers described similar experiences. Derchainanalyzed three Middle Kingdom stelae (upright slabs ofstone with inscriptions), that each commemorate a differentwriter’s pilgrimage to Abydos, <strong>the</strong> city sacred to<strong>the</strong> god Osiris. The three authors are Sehetepibre, Iyhernefert,and Mentuhotep. All three came from familieswealthy enough to ensure that <strong>the</strong>y were literate. Theyalso had access to libraries and archives and were familiarwith Egyptian literature. As authors, <strong>the</strong>y each chosedifferent aspects of <strong>the</strong> pilgrimage to emphasize in <strong>the</strong>iraccounts. Sehetepibre emphasized his loyalty to <strong>the</strong> kingand <strong>the</strong> way that <strong>the</strong> pilgrimage demonstrated that loyalty.Iyhernefert wrote about <strong>the</strong> ritual of Osiris that heobserved and attended when he went to Abydos. Mentuhotep’saccount supplements Iyhernefert’s account of<strong>the</strong> ritual, but he also included information on his ownearlier career and more epi<strong>the</strong>ts about himself. His accountis <strong>the</strong> most literary of <strong>the</strong> three. Its style is <strong>the</strong>most sophisticated, and he makes more references too<strong>the</strong>r Egyptian literature in his account. This higher styleconfirms his contention that he worked in <strong>the</strong> library ofa temple and might be considered more of an intellectualthan <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two authors. Sehetepibre and Iyhernefertwrite more like <strong>the</strong> bureaucrats <strong>the</strong>y were. Butbeyond style, each author chose to include different detailsof <strong>the</strong> pilgrimage. When combined with stylistic decisions,<strong>the</strong>se choices are what distinguish <strong>the</strong>m asauthors.FICTION AUTHOR. Ano<strong>the</strong>r example of a storywhose author had a distinctive voice was <strong>the</strong> anonymouswriter of The Contendings of Horus and Seth. AlanGardiner, <strong>the</strong> English Egyptologist, suggested in <strong>the</strong>early twentieth century that this story was a tale, writtendown from an oral storyteller’s recitation. Derchainand o<strong>the</strong>rs have realized that <strong>the</strong> story is too sophisticated,especially in its literary allusions, to be merely apopular story. In fact, it probably contains veiled referencesto <strong>the</strong> struggle for power which followed <strong>the</strong>death of Ramesses III (1156 B.C.E.) and continued in<strong>the</strong> reign of Ramesses IV (c. 1156–1150 B.C.E.). Somescholars have suggested that <strong>the</strong> story celebrates <strong>the</strong> accessionof Ramesses IV in <strong>the</strong> same way European kingsused to commission operas for <strong>the</strong>ir coronations. Thestory has a definite point of view and that in itself suggeststhat <strong>the</strong>re was a real author, though his name isnot known.WARS OF THUTMOSE III. Ano<strong>the</strong>r case study foran examination of authors’ voices concerns two worksof literature on <strong>the</strong> wars of Thutmose III (1479–1425Arts and Humanities <strong>Through</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Eras</strong>: Ancient Egypt (2675 B.C.E.–332 B.C.E.) 121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!