Through the Eras
Edward Bleiberg ed., Ancient Egypt (2675-332 ... - The Fellowship
Edward Bleiberg ed., Ancient Egypt (2675-332 ... - The Fellowship
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
LiteratureHyksos from Egypt. This was <strong>the</strong> first stage of driving<strong>the</strong>se foreign rulers out of <strong>the</strong> country. Scribes workingfor Hatshepsut (1478–1458 B.C.E.) produced narrativeinscriptions that described her birth and also <strong>the</strong> expeditionto <strong>the</strong> land of Punt (modern Ethiopia) that shecommissioned. They are found along with sculptural reliefat her temple in Deir el Bahri. The Annals of ThutmoseIII, carved on <strong>the</strong> walls of <strong>the</strong> Karnak Temple,present a narrative of battles, tactics, and booty thatseems to be a new kind of writing. Some scholars suggestthat <strong>the</strong>re was a Middle Kingdom tradition for suchtexts, though <strong>the</strong> evidence is meager. There is a fragmentaryTwelfth-dynasty inscription from Memphispublished in <strong>the</strong> reign of Amenemhet II (1876–1842B.C.E.) that might represent <strong>the</strong> precedent for ThutmoseIII’s inscription. There is also an Eighteenth-dynastymanuscript called The Berlin Lea<strong>the</strong>r Roll (because it iswritten on lea<strong>the</strong>r and preserved in <strong>the</strong> Egyptian Museumin Berlin) that might be a New Kingdom copy ofan historical inscription written in <strong>the</strong> Twelfth Dynastyduring <strong>the</strong> reign of Senwosret I (1919–1875 B.C.E.).Some scholars, however, have argued that this text wasan Eighteenth-dynasty forgery, designed to serve as aprecedent for similar New Kingdom texts. This argumentassumes that scribes were not free to invent newforms in <strong>the</strong> Eighteenth Dynasty and had to create aprecedent from <strong>the</strong> age of <strong>the</strong> classics in order to writenew kinds of works.AUTOBIOGRAPHIES. Eighteenth-dynasty autobiographieshave not been closely studied, but <strong>the</strong>y seemto be less central to <strong>the</strong> literature of <strong>the</strong> Eighteenth Dynastythan <strong>the</strong>y were in <strong>the</strong> Old and Middle Kingdoms.Nobles published <strong>the</strong>se autobiographies in <strong>the</strong>ir tombs,as was done in <strong>the</strong> Old Kingdom, and on statues, whichwas an innovation. There are no autobiographies on stelae,a practice typical in <strong>the</strong> Middle Kingdom. The personalsubject matter in <strong>the</strong>se autobiographies oftenconcentrates on military exploits or on religious subjects.Later in <strong>the</strong> Eighteenth and Nineteenth Dynasties <strong>the</strong>autobiographies are entirely religious ra<strong>the</strong>r than narrativesof personal experience. For some unknown reason,officials no longer considered <strong>the</strong>se personal experiencesto be important.HYMNS. Hymns were also a new creation in <strong>the</strong> NewKingdom. They were published mostly in tombs of noblesand bureaucrats, two of <strong>the</strong> social classes that couldafford elaborate Egyptian burials. Most of <strong>the</strong> hymns areunique copies, suggesting that perhaps <strong>the</strong> tomb ownercomposed <strong>the</strong>m for his own use. Hymns seem to be <strong>the</strong>literary form used to develop religious debates in writing.The Great Hymn to Osiris, for example, recorded on<strong>the</strong> Stela of Amenmose, gives <strong>the</strong> most complete accountin Egyptian of <strong>the</strong> myth of Osiris. It helps establish <strong>the</strong>cities where <strong>the</strong> god had temples, describes Osiris’ relationshipwith o<strong>the</strong>r gods, and associates <strong>the</strong> deceasedking with <strong>the</strong> god. The Hymns to <strong>the</strong> Sun God, recordedon <strong>the</strong> stela of Suti and Hor, argues through its multiplestanzas <strong>the</strong> primacy of <strong>the</strong> sun as a god. It lists <strong>the</strong>sun’s multiple names such as Amun, Harakhti, Re,Khepri, and Aten. It makes <strong>the</strong> argument that all of <strong>the</strong>segods are <strong>the</strong> equivalent of Amun. It was only during <strong>the</strong>Amarna Period of <strong>the</strong> Eighteenth Dynasty (1352–1332B.C.E.), a period of tremendous religious upheaval, thathymns utilized <strong>the</strong> language of common everydayspeech, a dialect called Late Egyptian. Late Egyptian represented<strong>the</strong> spoken language as it had evolved during<strong>the</strong> hundreds of years since <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> Middle Kingdom.The classical texts of <strong>the</strong> Twelfth Dynasty werewritten in Middle Egyptian, <strong>the</strong> spoken language of thatperiod. Now once again scribes were using everydayspeech to create new works of literature. Some scholarssuggest that Akhenaten understood <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>the</strong> colloquiallanguage as a way to conform with maat or rightconduct. The Egyptians <strong>the</strong>mselves provide no explanationfor this change.TWO LANGUAGES. Whe<strong>the</strong>r or not Eighteenthdynastyscribes created new literature, <strong>the</strong>y were familiarwith both <strong>the</strong> classical language of Middle Egyptianand <strong>the</strong> spoken language called Late Egyptian. In <strong>the</strong>historical work The Annals of Thutmose III, <strong>the</strong> authorwrote in Middle Egyptian, though <strong>the</strong>re are clues in certainword choices and grammatical forms that he was aLate Egyptian speaker. By <strong>the</strong> Nineteenth Dynasty, atleast one scribe living in Deir el-Medina in Upper Egyptowned a library that contained texts in both Middleand Late Egyptian. Numerous examples of Nineteenthdynastystudent copies of classics such as Sinuhe demonstratethat students used copying as one way to learn <strong>the</strong>older language. From <strong>the</strong> Nineteenth to <strong>the</strong> TwentiethDynasty, highly literate scribes must have known howto read <strong>the</strong> classical and <strong>the</strong> modern language.INNOVATION. The preserved record of New Kingdomliterature certainly creates <strong>the</strong> impression that <strong>the</strong>early Nineteenth Dynasty witnessed a sudden literaryrevolution. New forms including love poetry, narrativefiction, and occasional pieces appear, written in LateEgyptian. Scribes also wrote works following older formssuch as teachings, but composed in everyday speechra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> classical Middle Egyptian dialect. Still,it remains difficult to know whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re really was arevolution or if such texts existed in <strong>the</strong> Eighteenth Dynastybut did not survive into modern times.Arts and Humanities <strong>Through</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Eras</strong>: Ancient Egypt (2675 B.C.E.–332 B.C.E.) 133