27.10.2015 Views

UGANDA

1kK4lGa

1kK4lGa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THEMATIC ISSUES<br />

Participants considered political, ethnic and religious divisions in society to be interlinked,<br />

and another outcome of the colonial divide and rule policy. The development<br />

of Pre-Independence political parties, allegedly stimulated by the British, tended to<br />

be along both ethnic and religious lines; the first political party to be formed was the<br />

Uganda National Congress (UNC) in 1952, with a predominantly Baganda leadership<br />

and Protestant membership. The Democratic Party (DP), formed in 1954 and initially<br />

Buganda based, was by contrast predominantly Catholic.<br />

Ethnic divisions continued to pervade early political party formation in Uganda with an<br />

element of “anti-Bugandanism” introduced in 1958 by the Uganda People’s Union (UPU).<br />

The UPU was formed by established leaders outside the districts of Buganda sitting in<br />

Legco. 16 Three factions of the UNC waged war on each other until March 1960 when one<br />

wing of the UNC merged with the UPU to form the Uganda Peoples Congress (UPC) led<br />

by Obote. 17<br />

Divisions amongst political, ethnic and religious lines were influenced<br />

during the Lancaster Constitutional Conference in London in 1961. The<br />

Buganda delegation was led by Amos Sempa, who was against the Obote<br />

led UPC. However, Lord Carrington of the British Home Office reportedly<br />

told him during the Conference “Amos, we are aware that you do not like<br />

Obote, but the Crown likes him. This means you have no choice but to go<br />

with Obote.” 2 Lord Carrington also said that in the history of the British<br />

Empire, authorities had never handed over power to a non-Protestant<br />

and that Uganda was not going to be an exception. This unequivocal<br />

position by the British would largely determine the Ugandan post-colonial<br />

political landscape. 3<br />

The formation of the Baganda Kabaka Yekka (“Only the King”) party in 1961 split the<br />

Baganda between royalists who supported Baganda federalism (voting for Kabaka Yekka)<br />

and anti-royalists who were in support of a democratic and unitary nation state (voting<br />

for the DP).<br />

CONFLICT BETWEEN TRADITION AND MODERNITY<br />

Colonialism introduced an abrupt break with the past. Uganda’s subjugation by the<br />

British and the arrival of new systems, norms and technologies introduced a tension<br />

between ‘tradition’ and ‘modernity’. Participants referred to the introduction of ‘the<br />

new’ or ‘modern’ as an “erosion of cultural values”, or “moral degeneration”. It was said<br />

that colonialists and missionaries destroyed traditional institutions and values.<br />

The introduction of money and foreign religion provoked the most fundamental<br />

departures from traditional ways of life. Money was considered to set the stage<br />

for greed and conflict over land ownership. In Acholiland, for example, land was<br />

16 Legco is short for the Uganda Legislative Council, the predecessor of the National Assembly of Uganda<br />

before Uganda gained Independence<br />

17 In 1988, the President appointed Betty Bigombe as Minister of State for Pacification of Northern Uganda<br />

to his Cabinet. This has been noted by some as an indication that while the NRM focused on “pacifying”<br />

the north of Uganda, it focused on “development” for the rest of the country<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!