27.10.2015 Views

UGANDA

1kK4lGa

1kK4lGa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THEMATIC ISSUES<br />

More recent conflicts between citizens and the State over land are primarily related to the<br />

alignment of State interests with those of investors and oil<br />

companies. Such conflicts are thus<br />

understood<br />

as being simultaneously between<br />

citizens and the State and between citizens and investors.<br />

Government, it was said, disrespects citizens’ land rights in an effort to facilitate<br />

investments by business interests. As such, land owners are pushed off their land<br />

without adequate compensation, making the rich richer, and the poor poorer.<br />

Participants in Tororo discussed government-supported efforts by Madhvani (a major<br />

investor in commercial agriculture), to push people off 26 square kms of land, allegedly<br />

for phosphate exploitation. 4647<br />

In Nakasongola, it was said investors were paying the Government to evict the local<br />

Baruli from their land. Having received payment, it was said, the Government then evicts<br />

people without consulting the land owners and inhabitants. Particular individuals within<br />

Government were blamed for abusing their position of power to secure access to land.<br />

In Arua, the conflict was described as being driven by a “big man in the forest.” This was<br />

explained to be an indirect reference to President Museveni’s brother General Salim<br />

Saleh who, it was alleged, had forcefully occupied the Biafra Forest Reserve with the<br />

aim of building a shopping mall. In Hoima, land grabbing by top Government officials, in<br />

46 The same company is involved in similar controversy in Amuru District. In this District, Madhvani laid<br />

an interest in acquiring 40,000 ha for sugar plantations and factories. One of our reviewers commented<br />

“if this was not resisted by the locals in concert with their political leaders, the former IDPs would have<br />

had no land to return to, though the conflict is still protracted involving political dialogue as well as court<br />

action”<br />

47 For more information, see conflict number 35 in this Compendium.<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!