15.03.2018 Views

BAKER HUGHES - Drilling Fluids Reference Manual

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RESERVOIR APPLICATION FLUIDS<br />

Lab Validation<br />

Bridgewise calculations have been validated in<br />

the permeability lab using cores of known pore<br />

size. Bridging efficiency evaluations based on<br />

long-term mud-off times (24-48 hours) were used<br />

to demonstrate the performance of various PSD<br />

blends.<br />

In a recent drill-in fluid evaluation, tests were<br />

conducted on a field core having a pore diameter<br />

range between 3 to 35 μm (d50 = 20 μm).<br />

Bridgewise calculations suggested that MIL-<br />

CARB and FLOW-CARB 10 would be the<br />

optimum product mix for this core. The core was<br />

tested and similar cores were tested with blends<br />

suggested by the Abrams and Kaeuffer rules. The<br />

lab results confirmed that the Vickers Rule<br />

provided the best recommendation for controlling<br />

spurt and total filtrate volumes relative to the<br />

other PSD blends. More significantly, after 48<br />

hour dynamic and static exposure tests were<br />

completed, higher regain permeability results were also achieved.<br />

Clear Brine ESD Calculator (Equivalent Static Density)<br />

Introduction:<br />

When planning for a completion, or while on location, the brine engineer must be able to predict<br />

the effective hydrostatic pressure exerted by the brine completion fluid in the wellbore. He must<br />

know what fluid density to procure in order to have the effective downhole density required to<br />

balance formation pressures under static conditions. Brine fluids can expand and therefore their<br />

densities are reduced as fluid temperatures increase. Since the temperature of the wellbore<br />

increases with depth, the effective hydrostatic pressure of the brine column changes as the<br />

temperature changes. Conversely, brine fluids are somewhat compressible, offsetting some of the<br />

effect of thermal expansion. Thus, the net change in the brine column density must be calculated in<br />

advance to ensure adequate well control and to minimize client completion fluid costs.<br />

The temperature/pressure correction software program for clear brine developed by Baker Hughes<br />

<strong>Drilling</strong> <strong>Fluids</strong> is known as the Clear Brine ESD Calculator. Baker Hughes <strong>Drilling</strong> <strong>Fluids</strong>’<br />

Technology Group developed this calculator in response to the needs of field operations.<br />

Background:<br />

Before the development of the ESD Calculator, the industry used theoretical models to calculate<br />

the changes in density of brine due to temperature and pressure changes. The results derived from<br />

these models have not always been in close agreement with experimentally determined values at<br />

elevated temperatures and pressures for most of the brine blends used in the field. Furthermore, the<br />

change in density versus temperature and pressure are different for each brine type or blend.<br />

<strong>BAKER</strong> <strong>HUGHES</strong> DRILLING FLUIDS<br />

REFERENCE MANUAL<br />

REVISION 2006 6-106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!