15.03.2018 Views

BAKER HUGHES - Drilling Fluids Reference Manual

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FLUIDS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES<br />

BEST OPERATING PRACTICES<br />

Reducing the volume of waste and containing those substances with higher potential for pollution is<br />

critical to improve the environmental performance under a FES system. A key area for improvement<br />

is in the segregation and accounting of wastes. As a rule, treatment costs are higher as the<br />

concentration of hydrocarbon increases. If wastes free from hydrocarbons are commingled with oily<br />

residues then a larger than necessary volume of waste containing hydrocarbons is being treated.<br />

Likewise, poor accounting at both the rig site and at the waste treatment center could lead to<br />

differences between volume of waste sent and received. It is important that it is realized that all waste<br />

is not the same and even though it is waste, it needs to be tracked as carefully as any other asset. This<br />

is of particular importance to the operator as it is related to liability, duty of care and ownership of<br />

any waste.<br />

Volume Reduction<br />

An important part of the FES strategy is to reduce the overall volumes of fluids produced from the<br />

drilling and completion of each well. By reducing excess volume there will be a corresponding<br />

reduction in waste, bringing further cost benefits.<br />

The main sources of excess fluids volume are:<br />

a) Discharges of WBM<br />

• Limited fluids recycling and reuse.<br />

Water based drilling fluids by their nature are more readily biodegradable and have a shorter “shelf<br />

life” than oil based drilling fluids. As they are generally less inhibitive than OBM they tend to<br />

become solids laden more readily and require expensive separation processes to remove the<br />

incorporated drilled solids.<br />

In the past very little effort was spent on evaluating the economical and environmental potential of<br />

reusing WBM fluids in offshore operations. This was primarily due to the perception that the<br />

incremental cost of shipping, reconditioning and storing these fluids would be prohibitive. This is<br />

particularly evident when the water-based system is being replaced by an oil based system. Many<br />

drilling installations do not have the capacity or the facilities to handle two types of drilling fluids<br />

simultaneously and marine vessels do not have sufficient tanks to transport both systems<br />

independently.<br />

For onshore operations, dewatering techniques are used in the closed loop mud systems (CLMS) as<br />

an alternative to direct discharge of WBM drilling fluids. This process eliminates the use of reserve<br />

pits and recirculation pits or sumps, in the treatment and removal of drill solids from drilling fluids.<br />

The dewatering techniques used in this process combines conventional solids control equipment with<br />

chemically enhanced dewatering methods to remove the ultra-fine solids from the drilling fluid and<br />

dispose of it as a dry waste. The application of these techniques has grown in usage to become an<br />

integral part of routine drilling operations.<br />

Dewatering methods were initially used to treat the liquid drilling waste in a reserve pit, removing the<br />

solids and discharging the cleaned fluid. As the economic and environmental pressures grew to go to<br />

a CLMS operation, the use of coagulation and flocculation chemical technology in conjunction with<br />

decanting centrifuges and specialized dewatering equipment became the preferred method for drilling<br />

<strong>BAKER</strong> <strong>HUGHES</strong> DRILLING FLUIDS<br />

REFERENCE MANUAL<br />

REVISION 2006 14-20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!