06.09.2021 Views

Tacitus, Annals, 15.20­-23, 33­-45. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary, 2013a

Tacitus, Annals, 15.20­-23, 33­-45. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary, 2013a

Tacitus, Annals, 15.20­-23, 33­-45. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary, 2013a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

equirement of someone who took on the role of ‘princeps’: the elevated<br />

position of ‘the first or most outst<strong>and</strong>ing member of society’ required<br />

permanent justification, not least vis-à-vis those who had held that<br />

role before. Nero could clearly not hold his own in terms of military<br />

achievement, so he decided to excel in a field of social practice on which no<br />

princeps had hitherto left a conspicuous mark: cultural activities cultivated<br />

in Greece. Meanwhile, as John Henderson reminds us, what he forgot was<br />

the meaning of the dual Fortunes’ rule over Antium – ‘Fortune’ <strong>and</strong> (her<br />

opposite number) ‘Mis-Fortune’ (Or as Horace puts it at Odes 1.35.1–4: O<br />

diva, gratum quae regis Antium, | praesens vel imo tollere de gradu | mortale<br />

corpus vel superbos | vertere funeribus triumphos; ‘Divine Fortune, who rules<br />

over pleasing Antium, ready to raise a mortal body from the lowest rung or<br />

change proud triumphs into funeral processions’). He might have reflected<br />

both on what befell the gens Iulia when Bovillan Augustus’ daughter Julia<br />

was born (he divorced her mother Scribonia <strong>and</strong> took the baby ‘on the same<br />

day’: Dio 48.34.4) <strong>and</strong> that these games were most likely one feature of<br />

Tiberius’ celebration of Augustus’ death <strong>and</strong> deification (or ‘deathification’).<br />

And as for the Claudian clan, it was more lunacy to insist simultaneously<br />

on both Nero’s adoptive <strong>and</strong> birth lineage; <strong>and</strong> it was less than fortunate<br />

a reminder to recall the end of the last Claudian princess Octavia, whose<br />

gruesome death <strong>Tacitus</strong> had just recounted at the end of the previous book.<br />

<br />

exortae adulationes censentium honorem divae et pulvinar aedemque et<br />

sacerdotem. atque ipse ut laetitiae, ita maeroris immodicus egit.<br />

quae is a connecting<br />

relative (= ea). fuere = fuerunt. All the efforts were as written on water. <strong>Tacitus</strong><br />

announces this anticlimax <strong>with</strong> laconic brevity <strong>and</strong> a mocking f-alliteration.<br />

quartum intra mensem defuncta infante is a good example of another hallmark<br />

of Tacitean style, that is, the surprising distribution of information across<br />

main <strong>and</strong> subordinate clauses. Here the ‘vital’ element is packed into a<br />

(causal) ablative absolute, <strong>with</strong> the participle (defuncta) <strong>and</strong> noun (infante)<br />

further delayed for special effect. The language is very matter-of-fact <strong>and</strong><br />

unelaborated, again contrasting the simple reality of the death <strong>with</strong> the<br />

extravagant honours previously listed. In terms of syntax (<strong>and</strong> placement<br />

in the sentence) the phrase mirrors dato et Poppaeae eodem cognomento at <strong>23</strong>.1<br />

<strong>and</strong> the two ablative absolutes thus bracket the birth <strong>and</strong> the death of Nero’s<br />

daughter, adding to the overall sense of futility <strong>and</strong> finality.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!