Tacitus, Annals, 15.20-23, 33-45. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary, 2013a
Tacitus, Annals, 15.20-23, 33-45. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary, 2013a
Tacitus, Annals, 15.20-23, 33-45. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary, 2013a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
equirement of someone who took on the role of ‘princeps’: the elevated<br />
position of ‘the first or most outst<strong>and</strong>ing member of society’ required<br />
permanent justification, not least vis-à-vis those who had held that<br />
role before. Nero could clearly not hold his own in terms of military<br />
achievement, so he decided to excel in a field of social practice on which no<br />
princeps had hitherto left a conspicuous mark: cultural activities cultivated<br />
in Greece. Meanwhile, as John Henderson reminds us, what he forgot was<br />
the meaning of the dual Fortunes’ rule over Antium – ‘Fortune’ <strong>and</strong> (her<br />
opposite number) ‘Mis-Fortune’ (Or as Horace puts it at Odes 1.35.1–4: O<br />
diva, gratum quae regis Antium, | praesens vel imo tollere de gradu | mortale<br />
corpus vel superbos | vertere funeribus triumphos; ‘Divine Fortune, who rules<br />
over pleasing Antium, ready to raise a mortal body from the lowest rung or<br />
change proud triumphs into funeral processions’). He might have reflected<br />
both on what befell the gens Iulia when Bovillan Augustus’ daughter Julia<br />
was born (he divorced her mother Scribonia <strong>and</strong> took the baby ‘on the same<br />
day’: Dio 48.34.4) <strong>and</strong> that these games were most likely one feature of<br />
Tiberius’ celebration of Augustus’ death <strong>and</strong> deification (or ‘deathification’).<br />
And as for the Claudian clan, it was more lunacy to insist simultaneously<br />
on both Nero’s adoptive <strong>and</strong> birth lineage; <strong>and</strong> it was less than fortunate<br />
a reminder to recall the end of the last Claudian princess Octavia, whose<br />
gruesome death <strong>Tacitus</strong> had just recounted at the end of the previous book.<br />
<br />
exortae adulationes censentium honorem divae et pulvinar aedemque et<br />
sacerdotem. atque ipse ut laetitiae, ita maeroris immodicus egit.<br />
quae is a connecting<br />
relative (= ea). fuere = fuerunt. All the efforts were as written on water. <strong>Tacitus</strong><br />
announces this anticlimax <strong>with</strong> laconic brevity <strong>and</strong> a mocking f-alliteration.<br />
quartum intra mensem defuncta infante is a good example of another hallmark<br />
of Tacitean style, that is, the surprising distribution of information across<br />
main <strong>and</strong> subordinate clauses. Here the ‘vital’ element is packed into a<br />
(causal) ablative absolute, <strong>with</strong> the participle (defuncta) <strong>and</strong> noun (infante)<br />
further delayed for special effect. The language is very matter-of-fact <strong>and</strong><br />
unelaborated, again contrasting the simple reality of the death <strong>with</strong> the<br />
extravagant honours previously listed. In terms of syntax (<strong>and</strong> placement<br />
in the sentence) the phrase mirrors dato et Poppaeae eodem cognomento at <strong>23</strong>.1<br />
<strong>and</strong> the two ablative absolutes thus bracket the birth <strong>and</strong> the death of Nero’s<br />
daughter, adding to the overall sense of futility <strong>and</strong> finality.