06.09.2021 Views

Tacitus, Annals, 15.20­-23, 33­-45. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary, 2013a

Tacitus, Annals, 15.20­-23, 33­-45. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary, 2013a

Tacitus, Annals, 15.20­-23, 33­-45. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary, 2013a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Vatinius offers the occasion for a character-portrayal (or rather assassination)<br />

of malicious brilliance (34.2), before <strong>Tacitus</strong> claims that Nero conceived<br />

of the murder of his distant relative (<strong>and</strong> hence potential rival) Silanus<br />

Torquatus during the gladiatorial games put on by Vatinius (35.1). We then<br />

get an account of the events that led to Silanus’ death: charge, pending<br />

trial, pre-emptive suicide, speech of regret by the emperor, announcing<br />

that he would have exercised mercy even though the defendant was guilty<br />

as charged (35.2). The entire sequence is held together by a ‘factoid’ for<br />

which <strong>Tacitus</strong> could not conceivably have had any evidence: that the munus<br />

of Vatinius was the moment at which Nero began to plot the murder of<br />

Silanus. The suspicion that <strong>Tacitus</strong> here exercises creative license thickens<br />

in light of the fact that Cassius Dio (62.27.2, cited below) dates Silanus’<br />

suicide to the following year. Again, one may wonder how best to explain<br />

this discrepancy in our sources. If Cassius Dio got it right, did <strong>Tacitus</strong><br />

ride roughshod over chronological accuracy since he wished to plant a<br />

premeditated murder in Nero’s mind during Vatinius’ gladiatorial games,<br />

not least to blur the distinction between voluptas <strong>and</strong> scelus?<br />

<br />

<br />

adsumptus, dehinc optimi cuiusque criminatione eo usque valuit ut<br />

gratia pecunia vi nocendi etiam malos praemineret.<br />

Here we get a little portrait of one of Nero’s creatures – the parvenu<br />

Vatinius from Beneventum, who reputedly had a long nose (Juvenal, Satire<br />

5.46–7, Martial, Epigrams 14.96) <strong>and</strong> made a fortune under the emperor as<br />

informer <strong>and</strong> ‘sinister court-buffoon.’ 125 In his Dialogus de Oratoribus, <strong>Tacitus</strong><br />

mentions that Maternus eventually crushed the creature by means of some<br />

acid poetry (11.2). 126 The vocabulary of wickedness – foedissima, sutrinae,<br />

detorto, scurrilibus, contumelias, criminatione, malos – is densely packed here<br />

to give a very strong flavour of the corruption of Vatinius <strong>and</strong> of Nero’s<br />

court.<br />

<br />

After first establishing that<br />

Nero’s entire court teemed <strong>with</strong> disgusting misfits – the implication of inter<br />

125 Syme (1958) I 356.<br />

126 For the (uncertain) text, translation, <strong>and</strong> discussion see Bartsch (1994) 103–4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!