06.09.2021 Views

Tacitus, Annals, 15.20­-23, 33­-45. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary, 2013a

Tacitus, Annals, 15.20­-23, 33­-45. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary, 2013a

Tacitus, Annals, 15.20­-23, 33­-45. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary, 2013a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

34.2 ergo per compositos cantus grates dis atque ipsam recentis<br />

<br />

Beneventum interim consedit, ubi gladiatorium munus a Vatinio<br />

celebre edebatur.<br />

compositos implies that Nero wrote the songs<br />

himself.<br />

One can<br />

either supply agens <strong>with</strong> grates dis or take both grates <strong>and</strong> ipsam fortunam<br />

as accusative objects of celebrans in what would be a zeugma. The zeugma<br />

gives the sentence a slightly strained feel, helping to convey the oddity of<br />

Nero’s actions. ipsam recentis casus (= mis-fortune) fortunam (= luck, good<br />

fortune) celebrans amounts to a paradox.<br />

grates: See above on 20.1.<br />

The -que links celebrans <strong>and</strong> petiturus. Note the<br />

variatio here, this time in terms of word order: the present participle<br />

celebrans comes at the end of its phrase, whereas the future petiturus...<br />

comes at the beginning. The juxtaposition of a present participle <strong>and</strong><br />

future participle is striking: Nero has hardly finished dealing <strong>with</strong> one<br />

calamity before his mind is already set on the next outrage.<br />

<strong>Tacitus</strong> uses the poetic phrase maris<br />

Hadriae (lit. ‘of the Sea of Hadria’, i.e. the town of Adria, rather than plain<br />

adjectival ‘of the Adriatic Sea’). traiectus is accusative plural. One wonders<br />

what evidence <strong>Tacitus</strong> can have had for the claim that already in AD 64 Nero<br />

had plans to go straight from his first public appearance on stage at Neapolis<br />

on a tour through Greece – two years before he actually did. At 36.1, at any<br />

rate, <strong>Tacitus</strong> reports that Nero had dropped the plan for unknown reasons<br />

<strong>and</strong> returned from Beneventum to Rome: nec multo post omissa in praesens<br />

Achaia (causae in incerto fuere) urbem revisit (see below). Now it is true that<br />

Beneventum, though situated to the north of Neapolis, would be a good stop<br />

on the way to Brundisium, especially if Nero wanted to honour Vatinius <strong>with</strong><br />

his presence at the games: it was situated at the Via Appia (see Map of Italy);<br />

but for the same reasons, Nero might have gone there on his way back to<br />

Rome. Given that a tour of Greece by the emperor was a logistical challenge<br />

of the first order, it is rather unlikely that Nero opted for <strong>and</strong> against going

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!