"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
95<br />
/ their daily crust on farm and mine” (lines 10-11). In p<strong>or</strong>traying humans as birds<br />
Livingstone subtly points to humanity’s (ign<strong>or</strong>ed) connection with the animal kingdom.<br />
Livingstone’s early ecological awareness is thus evident in this poem which criticises a<br />
“linear” scientific view which does not acknowledge the multi-dimensional ecological<br />
web which supp<strong>or</strong>ts life on Earth. In “Adamast<strong>or</strong> Resuscitated” (S 12) the tenacious<br />
power of the Earth is also expl<strong>or</strong>ed through the image of Adamast<strong>or</strong>, Camoens’s defeated<br />
Titan <strong>or</strong> giant who became the continent of Africa. This poem, too, juxtaposes Africa’s<br />
robustness (through the trope of Adamast<strong>or</strong> who refuses to die) with human flippancy<br />
and disregard f<strong>or</strong> the regenerative power of the Earth.<br />
Sjambok and Other Poems from Africa repeatedly expl<strong>or</strong>es humankind’s<br />
alienation from nature, but I want to concentrate on “Falconer on a Skyscraper” and part<br />
of “Elements”.<br />
In “Falconer on a Skyscraper” (S 23), the falcon is read as a trope f<strong>or</strong> natural<br />
and rapturous instinct. The speaker is a falconer, a breeder and trainer of the female of<br />
these birds of prey. This implies control over the female bird. At the end of the poem the<br />
falconer imagines himself as the falcon who is able to mate with, <strong>or</strong> love, the female bird.<br />
Instinct and reason are both present in the speaker who weighs up the choice between a<br />
f<strong>or</strong>egoing of his desire and a rapacious, instinctual appetite, where love would lead to<br />
death: “should I now pitch her <strong>or</strong> love her to a sticky death?” (line 23). In pitching the<br />
falcon he would allow her to fly away and be free to hunt, <strong>or</strong> follow her natural instinct.<br />
The speaker’s dilemma is between his desire, which he knows to be rapacious,<br />
and a m<strong>or</strong>e benevolent <strong>or</strong> protective f<strong>or</strong>m of fatherly love, hinted at in the monastic<br />
connotations of “archimandrites”:<br />
how intolerable to be viewed at once by two loves–<br />
one cannot decide which side is to be presented,<br />
so here we perch like archimandrites <strong>or</strong> turtledoves…<br />
(lines 5-8)<br />
His “two loves” could be seen as the religious and the instinctual. However, this surreal<br />
description of the instinctual takes place against the setting of the city, “a sad wet nurse”<br />
(line 9) whose nurture, while useful, is not satisfact<strong>or</strong>y. The poem theref<strong>or</strong>e expl<strong>or</strong>es the<br />
tension between the urban and the natural, and between the religious and the instinctual.<br />
The unnatural situation of a falcon trained to hunt in the city points to an unecological<br />
position and it is this which engenders the dilemma between instinct and reason. Love is