"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
79<br />
This new idea-system… I shall simply call Humanism, because it can only be<br />
based on our understanding of man and his relations with the rest of the<br />
environment. It must be focused on man as an <strong>or</strong>ganism, though one with unique<br />
properties. It must be <strong>or</strong>ganized round the facts and ideas of evolution, taking<br />
account of the discovery that man is part of a comprehensive evolutionary<br />
process, and cannot avoid playing a decisive role in it.<br />
Such an Evolutionary Humanism is necessarily unitary instead of dualistic,<br />
affirming the unity of mind and body; universal instead of particularist, affirming<br />
the continuity of man with the rest of life, and of life with the rest of the universe;<br />
naturalistic instead of supernaturalist, affirming the unity of the spiritual and<br />
material; and global instead of divisive, affirming the unity of all mankind. (73)<br />
Livingstone demonstrates through his poetry that anthropocentrism is not<br />
sustainable in ecological terms. He articulates a reverence f<strong>or</strong> nature, but p<strong>or</strong>trays<br />
Darwinism not as the survival of the fittest with man at the top of the food chain, but<br />
from the perspective of a common ancest<strong>or</strong>. He prods his readers into contemplating the<br />
fact that humanity <strong>or</strong>iginated, along with other <strong>or</strong>ganisms, as a microbe in the primeval<br />
soup, and so puts us in our place.<br />
Williams claims that “nothing much can be done until we are able to see the<br />
causes of this alienation of nature” (1990: 82). This is also Livingstone’s preoccupation.<br />
It is, perhaps, an irresolvable problem and it frequently leads Livingstone into a position<br />
of ecological despair. He repeatedly examines the problem of humankind’s alienation<br />
from and of nature. Williams points out that there is no going back. While “many writers<br />
have created an idea of a rural past” (82), this use of past<strong>or</strong>alism seriously underestimates<br />
the problem. Livingstone uses the past<strong>or</strong>al mode in only a few poems and then often<br />
ironically. In the poems which do p<strong>or</strong>tray man and nature as united the tone is almost<br />
always one of yearning. This yearning f<strong>or</strong> a lost synthesis <strong>or</strong> state of innocence<br />
paradoxically both serves to compound the despair and to offer hope. This is an example<br />
of the tension between reason and imagination where a reasoned view of the present state<br />
of the w<strong>or</strong>ld points to a position of despair while an imagined view of a past<strong>or</strong>al ideal<br />
reawakens hope in the human heart. Livingstone uses both reason and imagination. His<br />
reason is philosophically and scientifically inf<strong>or</strong>med, but he often urges his readers to<br />
imagine the microbial activities which supp<strong>or</strong>t our physical w<strong>or</strong>ld, thereby taking science<br />
(which contributed, especially during the Enlightenment, to humanity’s separation from<br />
nature) and using it as an imaginative tool f<strong>or</strong> a synthesis between man and nature. Both<br />
evolution and microbial activity inf<strong>or</strong>m his poetry. Livingstone thus uses what Williams