"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
143<br />
examines evolution at cellular level. It is also imp<strong>or</strong>tant f<strong>or</strong> its expl<strong>or</strong>ation of human<br />
purpose, f<strong>or</strong> it demonstrates the limitations of human freedom and so contradicts the<br />
sentiments expressed in the sestet of "A Darwinian Preface". The poem uses as its base<br />
the evolution of bacteria into mitochondria, thus examining the interconnectedness of<br />
biological life from a microscopic perspective. The poem is about humanity’s puny<br />
eff<strong>or</strong>ts to escape <strong>or</strong> deny our “interned energies” (line 30), the mitochondria cells which<br />
process energy and thus keep us alive. It implies that we are merely sets of cells, and, in<br />
the end, this is all we can rely on. 32 Human-constructed concepts like duty, ethics,<br />
autonomy, faithlessness and faith, scripture <strong>or</strong> religion, hist<strong>or</strong>y, brotherhood and love<br />
pale into insignificance when life is viewed from a microbiological perspective. The<br />
poem concentrates on the physical aspect of being human, it is the “silent mitochondria”<br />
(line 16), that keep us alive, because without them our bodies would not be able to<br />
process energy from food molecules and we would die (Dawkins 1995: 45). This poem<br />
shows that despite our conscious actions, our claims to “autonomy” (line 22), we are held<br />
hostage by our biological structure.<br />
Previous critics have not grappled with the full imp<strong>or</strong>t of “Cells”. Brown’s review<br />
of the poem is sh<strong>or</strong>t and superficial. He focuses on the poet’s ethical and m<strong>or</strong>al dilemma<br />
at examining the cell from the c<strong>or</strong>pse and refers to “cellular fratricide” (99) to explain the<br />
final stanza’s “Woe will betide, betimes, the man / who kills his brother”. Sacks<br />
concentrates on this poem’s treatment of free-will and calls it a “clenched meditation on<br />
choice and fate” (line 3). He does not examine its scientific backbone and it is not clear if<br />
by “fate” he means biological fate.<br />
“Cells” takes the f<strong>or</strong>m of a meditation sparked by the sighting of a c<strong>or</strong>pse in the<br />
sea. Livingstone, as scientist, takes a sample from the water, hoping that it will contain a<br />
cell from the repellent c<strong>or</strong>pse, “that out there” (line 10), and looks f<strong>or</strong>ward to examining<br />
the contents of the cell through the miraculous voyeurism of the microscope. This<br />
intention to probe leads him into the third and central stanza which examines the power<br />
of the mitochondrium, an <strong>or</strong>ganelle that primarily functions to st<strong>or</strong>e and release energy<br />
32 Silver, in trying scientifically to define life (and admitting failure), asks “What is a cell?” and answers:<br />
“A cell is an <strong>or</strong>ganized dissipative system of molecules, often capable of reproduction… In practical terms<br />
it looks as though the unit of life is the cell” (323). Lynn Margulis makes this point: “Whether bacterial <strong>or</strong><br />
nucleated, the units of life are cells” (88).