"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
59<br />
to find a closer identification between the w<strong>or</strong>d and the thing, we have at the other his<br />
romantic-symbolist attempts to reconstruct new ways of seeing and feeling” (1984: 81).<br />
By his use of “romantic-symbolist” I take Chapman to mean a subjective view of modern<br />
unity, but this ‘classification’ makes no room f<strong>or</strong> the scientific – <strong>or</strong> material – aspect of<br />
Livingstone’s thought. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy defines materialism<br />
as:<br />
the general the<strong>or</strong>y that the ultimate constituents of reality are material <strong>or</strong> physical<br />
bodies, elements <strong>or</strong> process. It is a f<strong>or</strong>m of monism in that it holds that everything<br />
in existence is reducible to what is material <strong>or</strong> physical in nature… Many<br />
philosophers have been attracted to materialism both because of its reductive<br />
simplicity and its association with scientific knowledge. (Craig 6: 171)<br />
Materialism thus points to Livingstone’s physical <strong>or</strong> scientific view of the w<strong>or</strong>ld, while<br />
his psychic apprehensions are included in the Romantic view. By Romantic materialism I<br />
mean the view that the physical w<strong>or</strong>ld is made up of matter and energy and is subject to<br />
immutable laws of nature, but that this fact does not preclude a reverence f<strong>or</strong> the myriad<br />
interconnections and miraculous existence of life. Gillian Beer succinctly describes<br />
Romantic materialism as “a sense of the clustering mystery of a material universe” (142).<br />
An ecological overview of the critical response to Livingstone’s earlier w<strong>or</strong>k<br />
Apart from Michael Chapman’s extensive research on the earlier w<strong>or</strong>k of Douglas<br />
Livingstone, there is not a large body of critical writing in this area. Dirk Klopper’s<br />
contribution to Livingstone criticism includes a number of pages in his chapter “Ideology<br />
and the Study of White South African English Poetry” in Rendering Things Visible<br />
(1990), edited by Martin Trump, and a later article “A Libidinal Zone: The Poetic Legacy<br />
of Douglas Livingstone” (1997) (which includes some references to A Litt<strong>or</strong>al Zone).<br />
Geoffrey Haresnape’s article on Douglas Livingstone in the Dictionary of Literary<br />
Biographies (2000) offers a brief biography and a critical summary of all of his w<strong>or</strong>k.<br />
I have traced three master’s theses on Douglas Livingstone and another with a<br />
substantial chapter on his poetry. Written in the 1980s and early ’90s, none of the theses<br />
give an explicitly ecological reading of Livingstone’s poetry.<br />
Pieter Daniel de Wet examines ten South African poets in “The Widening Eye:<br />
Images of, Attitudes to, and Consciousness of the African Landscape, as Reflected in the<br />
W<strong>or</strong>k of Selected Poets” (1984). The chapter on Livingstone is titled “Africa Within”. De