24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

59<br />

to find a closer identification between the w<strong>or</strong>d and the thing, we have at the other his<br />

romantic-symbolist attempts to reconstruct new ways of seeing and feeling” (1984: 81).<br />

By his use of “romantic-symbolist” I take Chapman to mean a subjective view of modern<br />

unity, but this ‘classification’ makes no room f<strong>or</strong> the scientific – <strong>or</strong> material – aspect of<br />

Livingstone’s thought. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy defines materialism<br />

as:<br />

the general the<strong>or</strong>y that the ultimate constituents of reality are material <strong>or</strong> physical<br />

bodies, elements <strong>or</strong> process. It is a f<strong>or</strong>m of monism in that it holds that everything<br />

in existence is reducible to what is material <strong>or</strong> physical in nature… Many<br />

philosophers have been attracted to materialism both because of its reductive<br />

simplicity and its association with scientific knowledge. (Craig 6: 171)<br />

Materialism thus points to Livingstone’s physical <strong>or</strong> scientific view of the w<strong>or</strong>ld, while<br />

his psychic apprehensions are included in the Romantic view. By Romantic materialism I<br />

mean the view that the physical w<strong>or</strong>ld is made up of matter and energy and is subject to<br />

immutable laws of nature, but that this fact does not preclude a reverence f<strong>or</strong> the myriad<br />

interconnections and miraculous existence of life. Gillian Beer succinctly describes<br />

Romantic materialism as “a sense of the clustering mystery of a material universe” (142).<br />

An ecological overview of the critical response to Livingstone’s earlier w<strong>or</strong>k<br />

Apart from Michael Chapman’s extensive research on the earlier w<strong>or</strong>k of Douglas<br />

Livingstone, there is not a large body of critical writing in this area. Dirk Klopper’s<br />

contribution to Livingstone criticism includes a number of pages in his chapter “Ideology<br />

and the Study of White South African English Poetry” in Rendering Things Visible<br />

(1990), edited by Martin Trump, and a later article “A Libidinal Zone: The Poetic Legacy<br />

of Douglas Livingstone” (1997) (which includes some references to A Litt<strong>or</strong>al Zone).<br />

Geoffrey Haresnape’s article on Douglas Livingstone in the Dictionary of Literary<br />

Biographies (2000) offers a brief biography and a critical summary of all of his w<strong>or</strong>k.<br />

I have traced three master’s theses on Douglas Livingstone and another with a<br />

substantial chapter on his poetry. Written in the 1980s and early ’90s, none of the theses<br />

give an explicitly ecological reading of Livingstone’s poetry.<br />

Pieter Daniel de Wet examines ten South African poets in “The Widening Eye:<br />

Images of, Attitudes to, and Consciousness of the African Landscape, as Reflected in the<br />

W<strong>or</strong>k of Selected Poets” (1984). The chapter on Livingstone is titled “Africa Within”. De

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!