"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
187<br />
The poem w<strong>or</strong>ks with the idea of association. A holster stock inscribed with<br />
the name “A VON WEBERN” (line 5) and found on the beach sets up an association<br />
with the musician of the same name (stanza 1); the writer Anton Chekov is associated<br />
with Anton von Webern (stanza 2); and various (unlikely) images are used to ‘describe’<br />
Webern’s music (stanza 4). Association is a close cousin of representation <strong>or</strong> mimesis. In<br />
his Poetics Aristotle defines poetry as an imitation (Greek, mimesis) of human actions.<br />
M.H. Abrams explains: “By ‘imitation’ he means something like ‘representation’, in its<br />
root sense: the poem imitates by taking some kind of human action and re-presenting it in<br />
a new ‘medium’ <strong>or</strong> material – that of w<strong>or</strong>ds” (83). In the poem Webern is depicted as<br />
denying the idea that art represents life; art rather “enfolds” the essences that move<br />
unseen beneath <strong>or</strong> through what we usually picture as ‘life’. F<strong>or</strong> Livingstone Webern’s<br />
music represents human yearning, the “unspeakable sounds of music from my skull”<br />
(line 22). The evocative nature of the music is expl<strong>or</strong>ed through the effect of its sounds;<br />
through Livingstone’s use of w<strong>or</strong>ds in the poem; and through the shape of the poem’s<br />
four central stanzas where the blank zig-zag pattern reflects the “variation and space”<br />
(line 17) within the music and invokes the silence between the notes.<br />
The poem has two voices, that of the poet and that of the musician. In the opening<br />
and closing stanzas, the driftwood and the shape it takes in the mind of the poet act as a<br />
locus of association. In the final stanza the association between the poet and the musician<br />
is compared to a game of chess: “my move” and “the piece” (line 31), where the “piece”<br />
also refers back to the “small pieces” <strong>or</strong> compositions of the previous stanza. It is the<br />
poet’s turn to answer to the voice of the musician. He does this by paying tribute to<br />
Webern’s “long-lived notes” which, he implies, are m<strong>or</strong>e lasting <strong>or</strong> “durable” than<br />
“headstones” <strong>or</strong> physical monuments to the dead.<br />
Livingstone, as speaker in the first and final stanzas, frames the bracketed voice<br />
of Webern (“I am Anton” (line 7)) who cryptically speaks from the grave. An American<br />
soldier mistakenly shot him “at Mittersill in 1945” (line 6). The central four stanzas are a<br />
virtuoso display of Livingstone’s poetic skill where the power of the musician’s art<br />
speaks through the poet’s voice. Tony M<strong>or</strong>phet explains: “Just as it is, and is not,<br />
Webern, this speech is, and is not, the voice of Livingstone. Similarly it is, and is not, an<br />
account of Livingstone’s poetics” (206). In making the dead musician speak Livingstone<br />
gives his account of Webern’s manifesto: to create art even though “the notes [are] so