"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
71<br />
conjuring up a bizarre psychological and social landscape” (ibid.). “The Zoo Affair” is<br />
also cited as an example of the bizarre:<br />
Several poems in this collection, then, express acute states of crisis. The greater<br />
the poet’s feelings of alienation the less familiar … his mode of expression is<br />
likely to be … Of course, poetry which attempts to express the bizarre may easily<br />
become merely perverse. Livingstone’s sense of classical f<strong>or</strong>m, however, usually<br />
provides a necessary measure of restraint… he nevertheless daringly reveals the<br />
darker, obscurer areas of man’s experience where the instinctual responses are to<br />
h<strong>or</strong>r<strong>or</strong>, passion, isolation and death. (162)<br />
This bizarre element will become m<strong>or</strong>e predominant in A Litt<strong>or</strong>al Zone where it is used to<br />
convey an ecological message. (See particularly the later discussions on “The Wall<br />
Beyond Station X”, p 201, and “Descent from the Tower”, p 207.)<br />
Chapman points to the wider significance of The Anvil’s Undertone and suggests<br />
“peculiarly regional anxieties have their echoes and counterparts elsewhere”. He notes<br />
that “Livingstone has attempted to modify his reader’s sensibility by affirming the value<br />
of the imaginative life” (171). A page earlier Chapman talks of the individual expression<br />
in Livingstone’s w<strong>or</strong>k and gives an apt interpretation of Livingstone’s craft, but elides the<br />
messages behind the craft:<br />
The brilliant episode, then, is Livingstone’s f<strong>or</strong>te. His imagination creates the<br />
dramatic event, which is set solidly in its background. There is economy and<br />
coherence in his projection of a variety of subject-matter. He does not so much<br />
offer a depth of insight into the full complexity of the human condition as a<br />
superbly individual expression of the outward, demonstrative aspects of feeling.<br />
His poetry reveals a sensibility characterized by a profound discomf<strong>or</strong>t: the curse<br />
of being vulnerably human. (170)<br />
This concentration on Livingstone’s craft (“economy and coherence”, “superbly<br />
individual expression”) and certain emotional absolutes (“the human condition”, “the<br />
curse of being vulnerably human”) is a general tendency throughout Chapman’s book.<br />
This detracts from the ecological c<strong>or</strong>e <strong>or</strong> wider issues which are expl<strong>or</strong>ed and elucidated<br />
in the poetry.<br />
Literary ecocriticism was in its fledgling stages in the 1980s when Chapman’s<br />
book was published. Throughout this review of his criticism I have thought that his eff<strong>or</strong>t<br />
to explain and categ<strong>or</strong>ise Livingstone’s difficult poetry would have been aided by an<br />
ecologically inf<strong>or</strong>med approach. In sh<strong>or</strong>t, Chapman’s meticulous criticism is limited <strong>or</strong><br />
skewed in certain crucial ways. He concentrates on the poet’s craftsmanship at the