24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

61<br />

notes the “universality” of his poetry (32). He playfully but astutely calls Livingstone<br />

“a Casanova in modern dress” (11).<br />

The principal critical text on Douglas Livingstone’s earlier w<strong>or</strong>k is Michael<br />

Chapman’s Douglas Livingstone: A Critical Study of his Poetry (1981). It covers<br />

Livingstone’s first five collections of poetry in chronological <strong>or</strong>der, devoting a separate<br />

chapter to each w<strong>or</strong>k. Chapman has written prolifically on Livingstone: his other critical<br />

texts include a substantial chapter on the poet in South African English Poetry: A Modern<br />

Perspective (1984) 14 as well as a section in Southern African Literatures (1996).<br />

In the introduction to his book on Douglas Livingstone, Chapman writes: “Critics<br />

both in South Africa and in other countries have responded favourably to his talent”<br />

(1981: 9) and summarises comments from the 1960s and 70s which by and large refer to<br />

Livingstone’s treatment of the African landscape. The book as a whole expl<strong>or</strong>es this<br />

treatment of the landscape and its fauna and fl<strong>or</strong>a, and Livingstone’s craftsmanship as a<br />

poet. Chapman also notes:<br />

The Times Literary Supplement (1964) adds that Livingstone makes the African<br />

fauna and fl<strong>or</strong>a come ‘dangerously and aptly alive’. This is true; yet his subject is<br />

not ‘Africa’ in any narrow sense<br />

and suggests rather that “Livingstone’s subject is contemp<strong>or</strong>ary man” (10). This is only<br />

partly c<strong>or</strong>rect. Livingstone’s poetry examines the place of contemp<strong>or</strong>ary man within the<br />

w<strong>or</strong>ld and on (of) the Earth. His treatment of the non-human w<strong>or</strong>ld and the human<br />

relationship with both the natural and artificial environment are, I suggest, also<br />

predominant themes. (This is most fully developed in A Litt<strong>or</strong>al Zone.) F<strong>or</strong> example,<br />

while Chapman’s analysis of the imagery and “echo rhymes” (78) of “St<strong>or</strong>mshelter” (S<br />

11) is accomplished, I think he misreads the message of the poem when he claims “from<br />

the eye of the st<strong>or</strong>m we hear a person like ourselves, who is acutely conscious that the<br />

‘Old Saws’, the once trusted systems, cannot account f<strong>or</strong> his utter isolation” (78). The<br />

poem is m<strong>or</strong>e about fear than isolation. Nature’s power, signified by the st<strong>or</strong>m, induces<br />

the fear in the central stanza:<br />

‘Never stand under trees in a st<strong>or</strong>m.’<br />

Old saws have an ancient rhythm<br />

in them; but these dry, far from bold<br />

14 I am aware that this book has been updated and reprinted. The new edition became available when this<br />

thesis was in its final stages and theref<strong>or</strong>e has not been consulted here.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!