24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This famous phrase is often stripped of the f<strong>or</strong>ce with which it describes as a<br />

‘fallacy’ the attempt to centre the natural w<strong>or</strong>ld upon man’s sensibility. (45)<br />

A phenomenological reading would suggest that in personifying nature, Livingstone is<br />

conveying his perception of what he calls the Creative Principle. Nature, <strong>or</strong> the Earth, as<br />

the embodiment of the Creative Principle is given the power of a biological designer,<br />

hence an ontological f<strong>or</strong>ce which can create and, by implication, destroy life.<br />

Livingstone’s thesis is that we ign<strong>or</strong>e the Creative Principle at our peril. If we do not<br />

revere nature it will retaliate and destroy the human race. A perception that humanity is<br />

mostly unaware of this f<strong>or</strong>ce and is actively destroying the Earth’s biodiversity and<br />

natural habitats leads Livingstone into a position of ecological despair.<br />

The ecological themes identified in this chapter are all evident in “A Natural<br />

Hist<strong>or</strong>y of the Negatio Bacillus” (one of the ratiocinative poems from The Anvil’s<br />

Undertone 56), which p<strong>or</strong>trays humankind as a destructive bacterium. I offer the<br />

following analysis as a summary of Livingstone’s ecological preoccupation. In the poem<br />

Ecological destruction is wrought by humankind, which is p<strong>or</strong>trayed as the “negatio<br />

bacillus” <strong>or</strong> destructive, disease-causing <strong>or</strong>ganism. There is “no known cure” (verse iv).<br />

The only balancing hope f<strong>or</strong> this destructive f<strong>or</strong>ce is that a select few, people who are<br />

“wholly of the earth” (verse iv), are immune to it. The implication of the poem, then, is<br />

that ecological awareness and theref<strong>or</strong>e a symbiotic relationship between humans and<br />

their home, the Earth, would resist the spread of destruction. This, it is implied, would<br />

demand a return to innocence <strong>or</strong> an Eden-like state: “In the beginning was a w<strong>or</strong>ld quite<br />

naturally in contact with the principle of its creation” (verse ii). Like the seven days of<br />

creation in Genesis, this poem contains seven verses and the final verse may be<br />

interpreted as: on the seventh day of destruction, the poet rested.<br />

The poem uses scientific classification to expl<strong>or</strong>e the metaphysical. The tension is<br />

between heaven and earth (representative of emotion and intellect; of idealism and<br />

realism; of the imagined and the material; <strong>or</strong> the metaphysical and the physical). The<br />

poem ends with an appeal to both: “’O father in heaven and my mother earth’” (verse<br />

vii). It is only through a synthesis of intellect and emotion that the disease may be<br />

arrested. The disease of negatio bacillus is defined in the first verse. Its “pathogenesis”<br />

(verse i) <strong>or</strong> development occurs when emotion and intellect are separated. Emotion is<br />

regarded as metaphysical, from “heaven”, and intellect as physical, from “earth”.<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!