24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

57<br />

(173). Livingstone, too, speaks this “universal” and ecological language where Africa,<br />

f<strong>or</strong> him, is not a colonised continent, but a representative piece of the Earth.<br />

Catching a curved ball: the misinterpretation of Douglas Livingstone’s concerns<br />

Douglas Livingstone was a Darwinian and a Romantic materialist. His critics of the<br />

1970s and 80s mostly did not see this and so offered inadequate interpretations of his<br />

w<strong>or</strong>k and concerns. Take, f<strong>or</strong> example, the reaction to Livingstone’s catchw<strong>or</strong>d “Polit-<br />

Lit” (1976: 142). Chapman refers to it as disparaging (1984: 94), sc<strong>or</strong>nful (1996: 341)<br />

and derisive (2002: xxiii) and Dirk Klopper as scathing (1990: 289). While not wishing to<br />

focus on the fray, I must protest that “‘Africa Within Us’……?”, in which the w<strong>or</strong>d Polit-<br />

Lit appears, is not disparaging. There is certainly a tone of playful parody: “Polit-Lit does<br />

have one imp<strong>or</strong>tant function of course: to show the few readers interested that One’s<br />

Heart Is In The Right Place” (1976: 142). However, the main focus of Livingstone’s<br />

article is a carefully argued plea f<strong>or</strong> ecological sensibility and brotherhood. He opens by<br />

stating that (as Brecht had it) modern literature has not changed the heart of even one<br />

politician and that his own political poems “were complete disasters – bad poetry” and<br />

hence not publishable (1976: 142). Livingstone then describes the functioning of the cell<br />

and the biological process and uses this as an ecological metaph<strong>or</strong>:<br />

Each of us is a walking universe of completely disparate w<strong>or</strong>lds, continents and<br />

seas, with immense and differing populations, all <strong>or</strong>ganized together into some<br />

s<strong>or</strong>t of functioning coherence with the single inherent determination (if we are<br />

sane) to preserve life and what is left of our planet. (143)<br />

He ends the paper with poetic descriptions of the richness of South African life, followed<br />

by allusions to a shared humanity, the South African apartheid system of the time, and<br />

the miracle of the evolution of the human race. His final w<strong>or</strong>ds are:<br />

I feel in all humility we can but find this and much m<strong>or</strong>e to confess <strong>or</strong> celebrate<br />

within ourselves; discovering in the process the miracle against which no wall n<strong>or</strong><br />

law <strong>or</strong> barbed-wire can ever prevail: our uncommon humanity. (144)<br />

The phrase “uncommon humanity” refers to the singular miracle of the evolution of the<br />

human species. Livingstone argues, then, that politics pales into insignificance when<br />

measured against the miracle of life. Dirk Klopper reads the article quite differently. He<br />

argues convolutedly that:<br />

In his article ‘”Africa within us”…….?’ (1976), Livingstone uses science to<br />

counter political conceptions of literature. His parodic style is clever, subversive

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!