"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
180<br />
which inf<strong>or</strong>ms Livingstone’s counsel that an <strong>or</strong>ganic <strong>or</strong> nondual position is essential<br />
if humanity is to survive.<br />
In “A Visit<strong>or</strong> at Station 21” (53) Livingstone ‘twins’ the will and the<br />
imagination, where the will is taken to mean conscious intention which is engineered<br />
through the w<strong>or</strong>king of reason. He thus recognises the need f<strong>or</strong> a return to synthesis<br />
between imagination and reason. In an article titled “Imagination as Value”, the<br />
American poet, Wallace Stevens, conflates the two processes:<br />
A single, strong imagination is like a single, strong reason in this, that the extreme<br />
good of each is a spiritual good. It is not possible to say, as between the two,<br />
which is paramount. F<strong>or</strong> that matter it is not always possible to say that they are<br />
two. (735)<br />
A few pages later Stevens places m<strong>or</strong>e value on the imagination than on reason: “The<br />
truth seems to be that we live in concepts of the imagination bef<strong>or</strong>e the reason has<br />
established them. If this is true, then reason is simply the methodizer of the imagination”<br />
(738). Like Coleridge, Stevens sees the imagination as the power which enables us to<br />
perceive (737). Stevens, however, uses romantic in its descriptive sense and discounts<br />
the idea that the romantic and the imagination are necessarily coupled: “we must<br />
somehow cleanse the imagination of the romantic”. He sees the romantic as a f<strong>or</strong>m of<br />
sentimentality which “belittles” the imagination (727) and explains:<br />
The imagination is the liberty of the mind. The romantic is a failure to make use<br />
of that liberty. It is to the imagination what sentimentality is to feeling. It is a<br />
failure of the imagination precisely as sentimentality is a failure of feeling. The<br />
imagination is the only genius. (728)<br />
Curiously, Stevens here reflects the philosophy of the Romantics. The article’s<br />
underlying premise is that the imagination has been undervalued <strong>or</strong>, in Livingstone’s<br />
w<strong>or</strong>d, “sundered” so that humanity’s conscious actions are no longer tempered by its<br />
spiritualising and psychic power.<br />
“A Visit<strong>or</strong> at Station 21” emphasises mutuality between reason and imagination<br />
and shows that apprehension of this mutuality is necessary f<strong>or</strong> symbiosis. In this<br />
manifesto <strong>or</strong> ‘coming of age’ poem, an <strong>or</strong>ganic glimpse of his place in the w<strong>or</strong>ld stills<br />
“the old latent argument” (line 2) and gives him perspective. The “old latent argument”<br />
encompasses the pondering on the existence of God (including William Paley’s argument<br />
from design) and – m<strong>or</strong>e obliquely – questions like: What is life? Why are we here?<br />
What does it mean to be human? After complex philosophical ponderings, the poem ends