24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

180<br />

which inf<strong>or</strong>ms Livingstone’s counsel that an <strong>or</strong>ganic <strong>or</strong> nondual position is essential<br />

if humanity is to survive.<br />

In “A Visit<strong>or</strong> at Station 21” (53) Livingstone ‘twins’ the will and the<br />

imagination, where the will is taken to mean conscious intention which is engineered<br />

through the w<strong>or</strong>king of reason. He thus recognises the need f<strong>or</strong> a return to synthesis<br />

between imagination and reason. In an article titled “Imagination as Value”, the<br />

American poet, Wallace Stevens, conflates the two processes:<br />

A single, strong imagination is like a single, strong reason in this, that the extreme<br />

good of each is a spiritual good. It is not possible to say, as between the two,<br />

which is paramount. F<strong>or</strong> that matter it is not always possible to say that they are<br />

two. (735)<br />

A few pages later Stevens places m<strong>or</strong>e value on the imagination than on reason: “The<br />

truth seems to be that we live in concepts of the imagination bef<strong>or</strong>e the reason has<br />

established them. If this is true, then reason is simply the methodizer of the imagination”<br />

(738). Like Coleridge, Stevens sees the imagination as the power which enables us to<br />

perceive (737). Stevens, however, uses romantic in its descriptive sense and discounts<br />

the idea that the romantic and the imagination are necessarily coupled: “we must<br />

somehow cleanse the imagination of the romantic”. He sees the romantic as a f<strong>or</strong>m of<br />

sentimentality which “belittles” the imagination (727) and explains:<br />

The imagination is the liberty of the mind. The romantic is a failure to make use<br />

of that liberty. It is to the imagination what sentimentality is to feeling. It is a<br />

failure of the imagination precisely as sentimentality is a failure of feeling. The<br />

imagination is the only genius. (728)<br />

Curiously, Stevens here reflects the philosophy of the Romantics. The article’s<br />

underlying premise is that the imagination has been undervalued <strong>or</strong>, in Livingstone’s<br />

w<strong>or</strong>d, “sundered” so that humanity’s conscious actions are no longer tempered by its<br />

spiritualising and psychic power.<br />

“A Visit<strong>or</strong> at Station 21” emphasises mutuality between reason and imagination<br />

and shows that apprehension of this mutuality is necessary f<strong>or</strong> symbiosis. In this<br />

manifesto <strong>or</strong> ‘coming of age’ poem, an <strong>or</strong>ganic glimpse of his place in the w<strong>or</strong>ld stills<br />

“the old latent argument” (line 2) and gives him perspective. The “old latent argument”<br />

encompasses the pondering on the existence of God (including William Paley’s argument<br />

from design) and – m<strong>or</strong>e obliquely – questions like: What is life? Why are we here?<br />

What does it mean to be human? After complex philosophical ponderings, the poem ends

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!