24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

69<br />

while I claim the undertone is a metaph<strong>or</strong> f<strong>or</strong> the reverberations of the abused Earth (<strong>or</strong><br />

nature) which is being damaged by humankind’s wanton misuse of its resources.<br />

Chapman says The Anvil’s Undertone is also about “man’s knowledge of isolation and<br />

his need f<strong>or</strong> relationship in an uncertain w<strong>or</strong>ld” (143).<br />

The poem “A Piece of Earth” in which the poet comes across a duiker trapped in a<br />

snare depicts, f<strong>or</strong> Chapman, the desperate struggle to exist:<br />

In these lines Livingstone achieves a symbolism which is in a sense direct speech.<br />

Animal existence and landscape are both so austere that a plain statement (‘The<br />

earth remains unmoving’) is somehow inf<strong>or</strong>med with sympathy f<strong>or</strong> the wretched<br />

creature. (145)<br />

Is Chapman claiming that the landscape (<strong>or</strong> the earth) feels sympathy f<strong>or</strong> the duiker? His<br />

syntax is not clear, but if this is what he means, it is inc<strong>or</strong>rect. It is we, as readers, who<br />

feel sympathy f<strong>or</strong> the duiker. Livingstone indicates in this poem that although nature is<br />

indifferent to the suffering of animal life (including man) through the phrase “the earth<br />

remains unmoving”, humankind, in the f<strong>or</strong>m of the careless poacher, is the pariah. In<br />

fairness, Chapman does c<strong>or</strong>rectly add: “‘A Piece of Earth’ is a powerful nature study<br />

which evokes the naked extremity of the primary struggles” (145). (See p 89 f<strong>or</strong> a fuller<br />

discussion of this poem.)<br />

Chapman rightly notes there are several poems which, in their attempt to define<br />

and analyse experience, introduce a ratiocinative voice (146) and gives “A Natural<br />

Hist<strong>or</strong>y of the Negatio Bacillus” as an example. (This ‘ratiocinative voice’ is carried<br />

strongly into A Litt<strong>or</strong>al Zone.) Acc<strong>or</strong>ding to Chapman, The Anvil’s Undertone displays<br />

three aspects of Livingstone’s poetic development: his response to the scientific attitude;<br />

his exploitation of surrealistic effects; and his presentation of peculiarly South African<br />

social realities (146). Haresnape also pinpoints three main themes: concern with the<br />

natural w<strong>or</strong>ld; the differing outlooks of colonizer and colonized; and religion (252). Both<br />

Chapman’s and Haresnape’s explanations are c<strong>or</strong>rect, but limited. I claim the<br />

predominant theme of this collection is ecological destruction and argue this m<strong>or</strong>e fully<br />

in the next chapter.<br />

Chapman argues that the ratiocinative poems “Homeostasis”, “Isotopes” and<br />

“Reciprocals” draw their imagery from both scientific and romantic sources and “are all<br />

concerned with the relationship of ‘thought’ and ‘emotion’, of ‘reason’ and ‘mystery’, in<br />

human life” (147) while Haresnape argues that the underlying concern of “A Natural

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!