"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
69<br />
while I claim the undertone is a metaph<strong>or</strong> f<strong>or</strong> the reverberations of the abused Earth (<strong>or</strong><br />
nature) which is being damaged by humankind’s wanton misuse of its resources.<br />
Chapman says The Anvil’s Undertone is also about “man’s knowledge of isolation and<br />
his need f<strong>or</strong> relationship in an uncertain w<strong>or</strong>ld” (143).<br />
The poem “A Piece of Earth” in which the poet comes across a duiker trapped in a<br />
snare depicts, f<strong>or</strong> Chapman, the desperate struggle to exist:<br />
In these lines Livingstone achieves a symbolism which is in a sense direct speech.<br />
Animal existence and landscape are both so austere that a plain statement (‘The<br />
earth remains unmoving’) is somehow inf<strong>or</strong>med with sympathy f<strong>or</strong> the wretched<br />
creature. (145)<br />
Is Chapman claiming that the landscape (<strong>or</strong> the earth) feels sympathy f<strong>or</strong> the duiker? His<br />
syntax is not clear, but if this is what he means, it is inc<strong>or</strong>rect. It is we, as readers, who<br />
feel sympathy f<strong>or</strong> the duiker. Livingstone indicates in this poem that although nature is<br />
indifferent to the suffering of animal life (including man) through the phrase “the earth<br />
remains unmoving”, humankind, in the f<strong>or</strong>m of the careless poacher, is the pariah. In<br />
fairness, Chapman does c<strong>or</strong>rectly add: “‘A Piece of Earth’ is a powerful nature study<br />
which evokes the naked extremity of the primary struggles” (145). (See p 89 f<strong>or</strong> a fuller<br />
discussion of this poem.)<br />
Chapman rightly notes there are several poems which, in their attempt to define<br />
and analyse experience, introduce a ratiocinative voice (146) and gives “A Natural<br />
Hist<strong>or</strong>y of the Negatio Bacillus” as an example. (This ‘ratiocinative voice’ is carried<br />
strongly into A Litt<strong>or</strong>al Zone.) Acc<strong>or</strong>ding to Chapman, The Anvil’s Undertone displays<br />
three aspects of Livingstone’s poetic development: his response to the scientific attitude;<br />
his exploitation of surrealistic effects; and his presentation of peculiarly South African<br />
social realities (146). Haresnape also pinpoints three main themes: concern with the<br />
natural w<strong>or</strong>ld; the differing outlooks of colonizer and colonized; and religion (252). Both<br />
Chapman’s and Haresnape’s explanations are c<strong>or</strong>rect, but limited. I claim the<br />
predominant theme of this collection is ecological destruction and argue this m<strong>or</strong>e fully<br />
in the next chapter.<br />
Chapman argues that the ratiocinative poems “Homeostasis”, “Isotopes” and<br />
“Reciprocals” draw their imagery from both scientific and romantic sources and “are all<br />
concerned with the relationship of ‘thought’ and ‘emotion’, of ‘reason’ and ‘mystery’, in<br />
human life” (147) while Haresnape argues that the underlying concern of “A Natural