"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Life I know as<br />
a boundless search f<strong>or</strong><br />
things greater than<br />
life to add to life.<br />
The mud stained hunt<br />
in me, looking f<strong>or</strong><br />
a few crystal lines,<br />
is quite cheerful,<br />
unavailing<br />
yet, but prospective:<br />
still expectant.<br />
This expectancy and implied hope become, on the whole, m<strong>or</strong>e muted and are replaced<br />
by despair at humankind’s abusive attitude in Livingstone’s next (and fifth) collection,<br />
The Anvil’s Undertone, and are carried into A Litt<strong>or</strong>al Zone.<br />
4. Ecological destruction<br />
Those of Livingstone’s poems which expl<strong>or</strong>e ecological destruction show that “the<br />
balance” referred to by Livingstone (see above) has not been redressed. Edward O.<br />
Wilson refers to “the juggernaut the<strong>or</strong>y of human nature, which holds that people are<br />
programmed by their genetic heritage to be so selfish that a sense of global responsibility<br />
will come too late” (186). He claims that humans are genetically programmed to plan<br />
ahead f<strong>or</strong> no m<strong>or</strong>e than two generations and tend to underestimate the impact of natural<br />
cataclysms. This leads directly to human-induced destruction of the ecology. Is this<br />
“myopic fog” (186) inescapable? Livingstone often seems to think it is.<br />
Ecological destruction is a predominant theme in Sjambok and Other Poems from<br />
Africa and The Anvil’s Undertone and is not as obviously <strong>or</strong> repeatedly expl<strong>or</strong>ed in the<br />
other collections. “Discovery” (S 48) reflects Livingstone’s despair. His “discovery” is<br />
an ecological one: humankind is shown to be an intruder on the Earth and a mad selfkiller.<br />
The speaker is distanced by the use of the second-person pronoun “you”. He acts<br />
both as speaker and as representative of humankind in general. The man walking and<br />
hunting in the night is shown to be a blundering, noisy fool whose prowling is deafening<br />
to the small creatures. In the fourth stanza he is compared to a rat, <strong>or</strong> the vermin of the<br />
animal w<strong>or</strong>ld. But, it is implied, unlike the rodent whose scavenging has an ecological<br />
purpose, humankind cannot even claim this: “But you, ratlike in certain respects /<br />
certainly, have got an appointment next / do<strong>or</strong> to nowhere” (lines 10-12). In sh<strong>or</strong>t,<br />
110