24.12.2012 Views

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

"Symbiosis or Death": - Rhodes University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

27<br />

discourse, but as a fundamental means of initiating discovery, we shall better<br />

understand its value as a part of the<strong>or</strong>y f<strong>or</strong> Darwin” (ibid.). At the start of a chapter<br />

titled “Analogy, metaph<strong>or</strong> and narrative in The Origin”, Beer reminds us that Aristotle in<br />

the Poetics wrote that metaph<strong>or</strong> is a sign of genius (73), and ends the chapter with a<br />

statement about the power of metaph<strong>or</strong> to communicate the otherwise inexplicable:<br />

The quagmire of the metaph<strong>or</strong>ic troubles Darwin, yet he needs it – he needs its<br />

tendency to suggest m<strong>or</strong>e <strong>or</strong> other than you meant to say, to make the latent<br />

actual, to waken sleeping dogs, and equally, he needs its powers of persuasion<br />

through lassitude, through our inattention. (95)<br />

Livingstone’s poetry is similarly a startling mixture of hard-nosed scientific fact and rich<br />

metaph<strong>or</strong>. A full understanding of his poetry requires rigour and scientific research on the<br />

part of the reader. But this difficulty is not insurmountable and the advantage is that<br />

Livingstone’s use of science in his poetry gives it a greater depth and pertinence. The<br />

poetry presents a fuller picture of how the w<strong>or</strong>ld w<strong>or</strong>ks.<br />

Sidney and Shelley both laud poetry over prose. While literature in general has an<br />

obvious role within ecocriticism (the expression of ecological awareness through<br />

literature) Bate’s argument that poetry is “an especially efficient system f<strong>or</strong> recycling the<br />

richest thoughts and feelings of a community” (247) is compelling. Shelley compares<br />

poetry and prose:<br />

A poem is the very image of life expressed in its eternal truth. There is this<br />

difference between a st<strong>or</strong>y and a poem, that a st<strong>or</strong>y is a catalogue of detached<br />

facts, which have no other bond of connexion than time, place, circumstance,<br />

cause and effect; the other is the creation of actions acc<strong>or</strong>ding to the unchangeable<br />

f<strong>or</strong>ms of human nature, as existing in the mind of the creat<strong>or</strong>, which is itself the<br />

image of all other minds. (in Reiman 485)<br />

He is here assuming a common humanity perhaps akin to C.G. Jung’s collective<br />

unconscious and becomes m<strong>or</strong>e vague when talking about the ‘ingredients’ of a poem.<br />

But, how does one define what makes up “eternal truth”? Livingstone partly resolves this<br />

conundrum by positing a Creative Principle. Later Shelley says: “Poetry lifts the veil<br />

from the hidden beauty of the w<strong>or</strong>ld” (487). In the end, I think that only poetry can<br />

explain poetry.<br />

Just as the nature of poetry is, essentially, indefinable so, too, is humankind’s<br />

place on Earth. We don’t really know why we are here and this is why we struggle to<br />

know how to be on the Earth. If this were not so, would Heidegger, f<strong>or</strong> example, have

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!